The Disruption of Dakṣa’s Sacrifice, the Hari-Hara Conflict, and the Establishment of Rudra’s Sacrificial Share
Pūrva Bhāga · Pr̥thivī-uddhāra and Iconographic Description (Narrative Passage)
एकं गदां भ्रामयति द्वितीयं दण्डमेव च । एकं शोभति कण्ठस्थैर्मणिभिस्त्वस्थिभिः परम् । एकं पीताम्बरं तत्र द्वितीयं सर्पमेखलम् ॥ २१.५६ ॥
ekaṁ gadāṁ bhrāmayati dvitīyaṁ daṇḍam eva ca | ekaṁ śobhati kaṇṭhasthair maṇibhis tv asthibhiḥ param | ekaṁ pītāmbaraṁ tatra dvitīyaṁ sarpamekhalam || 21.56 ||
ekaM gadAM bhrAmayati dvitIyaM daNDameva cha | ekaM shobhati kaNThasthairmaNibhistvasthibhiH param | ekaM pItAmbaraM tatra dvitIyaM sarpamekhalam || 21.56 ||
一方はガダー(棍棒)を振り回し、第二はただ杖(ダンダ)を執るのみ。ひとつは喉元の宝珠により輝き、さらに至上として骨をもって荘厳される。ひとつは黄衣(ピータームバラ)をまとい、第二は蛇の帯(サルパ・メーカラー)を締める。
Varāha
Adornment with jewels vs bones, yellow silk vs serpent-girdle: prosperity and cremation-ground austerity are presented as two faces of the divine, both within cosmic order.
See ‘śubha’ and ‘ugra’ experiences as complementary; cultivate equanimity amid wealth/beauty and loss/impermanence.
21.21.54-55 (continuing attribute-catalogue)
The verse preserves a stylized, comparative description of attributes (weapons, ornaments, garments) that can be used in manuscript studies and art-history research to trace Purāṇic iconographic conventions and their later reception in temple imagery.
No geographic location is named in this verse fragment; it is primarily descriptive (iconographic/attribute-focused) rather than topographical.
No explicit ethical injunction is stated here; the passage functions as descriptive narration, emphasizing recognizable attributes and symbolic markers rather than prescribing conduct.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.