The Greatness of the Sacred Pond Called Asikuṇḍa
Pūrva Bhāga · Anṛṇatā (Freedom from Debt/Obligation) and Filial Dharma
प्रतिगृह्य च तत्सर्वं तमुवाच स नारदः ॥ पितुर्ह्यनृणतां गत्वा स पुत्रो धर्मभाग्भवेत् ॥
pratigṛhya ca tat sarvaṁ tam uvāca sa nāradaḥ || pitur hy anṛṇatāṁ gatvā sa putro dharmabhāg bhavet ||
pratigRRihya cha tatsarvaM tamuvAcha sa nAradaH || piturhyanRRiNatAM gatvA sa putro dharmabhAgbhavet
「それら一切を受け取って、ナーラダは彼に言った。『父に対する負い(恩債)を果たして無債となってこそ、子はダルマに正しく与る者となる。』」
Varāha (quoting Nārada)
Moral agency is conditioned by prior obligations; ‘freedom’ (ānṛṇya) is achieved by discharging duties to one’s sources—especially parents/ancestors.
Repay parental/ancestral debts through service, ethical continuity, and (where applicable) śrāddha/lineage responsibilities before claiming moral authority.
A son becomes truly entitled to dharma only after attaining ānṛṇya—freedom from debt/obligation to the father (i.e., by fulfilling filial duties).
Fulfilling pitṛ-ṛṇa grants dharmic eligibility, merit, and ancestral satisfaction; neglect keeps one ‘in debt,’ obstructing dharma and inviting pitṛ-displeasure.
166.7.0 (king’s confusion about ānṛṇya)
It preserves a dharma-ethical concept (ṛṇa/anṛṇa) central to Brahmanical normative thought, linking social legitimacy to discharge of familial obligations.
No location is specified; the verse is conceptual, focused on ethical status and obligation.
A son should address outstanding obligations connected with the father/lineage; ethical standing (dharma participation) is framed as contingent on fulfilling such duties.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.