A Sūtra-like Manual of Expiations for Ritual Transgressions
Uttara Bhāga · Dialogue Framework: Pṛthivī Questions Varāha on Expiation
ततो भूमिर्वचः श्रुत्वा प्रत्युवाच पुनर्हरिम् ॥ कुसुम्भशाकनैवेद्यप्रापणेन च किल्बिषात् ॥
tato bhūmir vacaḥ śrutvā pratyuvāca punar harim | kusumbhaśākanaivedyaprāpaṇena ca kilbiṣāt ||
tato bhUmirvachaH shrutvA pratyuvAcha punarharim || kusumbhashAkanaivedyaprApaNena cha kilbiShAt
そのとき大地はその言葉を聞いて、再びハリに答えた。「クスンバ(kusumbha)の青菜からなる食供を供え(あるいは用意し)たことによって生じた過失ゆえに……」。
Pṛthivī (Bhūmi/Vasundharā)
Concerned, seeking clarification about fault and remedy
What is the nature and consequence of the fault incurred by offering/providing a naivedya of kusumbha-greens, and how is it to be addressed?
Even seemingly small ritual acts (food offerings) can carry ethical/ritual valence; dharma requires attentiveness and correction.
When uncertain about an offering’s propriety or a lapse, seek authoritative guidance and perform prescribed prāyaścitta rather than ignoring the fault.
Earth turns back to Hari/Varāha with a follow-up about a specific ritual fault involving kusumbha-greens.
A specific naivedya/provision involving kusumbha-greens is treated as a kīlbiṣa (ritual fault) requiring expiation.
Unexpiated ritual fault leads to pāpa-taint; expiation (stated in subsequent verses) removes it.
Varāha Purāṇa 136.79.0 (Earth asks for expiation); Varāha Purāṇa 136.81.0–136.82.0 (specific prāyaścitta and result)
It exemplifies the Purāṇic catechism style: an inquirer (Earth) prompts a doctrinal-ritual clarification from the instructor (Varāha).
No geographic location is specified; the verse is situated in a didactic dialogue context.
Ritual actions involving offerings are treated as ethically consequential, prompting the need for clarification and expiation where faults are perceived.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.