Valmiki Ramayana 2.8.3: Ayodhya Kanda, Sarga 8, Shloka 3
मन्थराकैकेयीसंवादः · Mantharā’s Counsel to Kaikeyī
Ayodhyā’s Succession Alarm
Spoken by Manthara to KaikeyiSetting: Ayodhya (palace; queens’ quarters)
मनसा प्रहसामि त्वां देवि दुःखार्दिता सती ।
यच्छोचितव्ये हृष्टाऽसि प्राप्येदं व्यसनं महत् ॥३॥
manasā prahasāmi tvāṃ devi duḥkhārditā satī |
yac chocitavye hṛṣṭā ’si prāpya idaṃ vyasanaṃ mahat ||3||
देवि, दुःखार्दिता सती मनसा त्वां प्रहसामि। यत् शोचितव्ये त्वं हृष्टाऽसि, इदं महद् व्यसनं प्राप्य॥
Sandhi Notes
- yacchocitavye → yat + śocitavye
- hṛṣṭā'si → hṛṣṭā + asi
- prāpyedam → prāpya + idam
O queen! at a time when this great misfortune has befallen you, you are rejoicinginstead of feeling miserable. I am indeed laughing at you at heart.
The teaching
Joy at another’s downfall is a sign of inner disorder; propriety demands grief and empathy when calamity strikes the righteous.
Duties in tension
- Compassionate restraint vs righteous rebuke of adharma
- Queenly decorum vs moral protest in crisis
- Ethical theme
- Sadācāra (ethical propriety)
- How it resolves
- Verbal censure as moral witnessing
For your practice
Cultivate empathy and appropriate emotional response (aucitya); observe inner reactions (manas) and correct schadenfreude into karuṇā.
Mood and themes
- Rasa
- Karuna (compassion), with Raudra (fury)
- Mood
- Wounded, scornful, grief-struck
Themes
- Dharma
- Ethics
- Misplaced-joy
- Manipulation
- Satya (truth vs. emotional distortion)
Misplaced rejoicing amid calamity reflects tamas/rajas overpowering sattva; inner witness (sākṣin) observes the mind’s distortions.
Theme of inner vs outer (manasā) aligns with Upaniṣadic inwardness: true appraisal occurs within; outward roles can mask inner disorder.
- Kausalya and Kaikeyi
- Co-wives; one rebukes the other (implied speaker addressing ‘devi’) (adversarial)
- Kaikeyi and Rama
- Stepmother causing calamity (implied) (hostile)
- Kausalya and Rama
- Mother-son; mother distressed by son’s impending exile (implied) (sorrowful)
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.8 (queens’ emotional reactions around the exile crisis); Rāmcaritmānas Ayodhyākāṇḍ (lamentations and moral rebukes surrounding Kaikeyī’s joy)
Dharmaśāstric notion of aucitya (propriety) in emotion and conduct (general)
2.9–2.10 (escalation of the exile/boon crisis); 2.47–2.50 (Ayodhya’s grief; contrast to Kaikeyī’s stance)
Anuṣṭup
Grieving
Low, heavy; slight ironic lift on ‘प्रहसामि’ then fall into ‘व्यसनं महत्’
FAQs
It underscores the need for right discernment (viveka) in moral life: rejoicing at what is framed as another’s success can be portrayed as dangerous when driven by rivalry; dharma requires truthful appraisal rather than reactive emotion.
At the outset of her provocation, Mantharā rebukes Kaikeyī for being pleased at news that favors Rāma, insisting it is actually a calamity for Kaikeyī’s interests.
The verse implicitly calls for prudence and discernment; it also displays Mantharā’s skill in psychological pressure rather than virtue.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Valmiki Ramayana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
