कौशल्याविलापः · Kausalya’s Lament and the Vision of Rama’s Return
अथ स्म नगरे रामश्चरन् भैक्षं गृहे वसेत् ।
कामकारो वरं दातुमपि दासं ममात्मजम् ॥४॥
atha sma nagare rāmaś caran bhaikṣaṃ gṛhe vaset |
kāmakāro varaṃ dātum api dāsaṃ mamātmajam ||4||
അവളുടെ ഇഷ്ടത്തിന് വഴങ്ങി എന്റെ പുത്രനെ ദാസനായി പോലും കൊടുത്തിരുന്നാൽ നന്നായിരുന്നു; അങ്ങനെങ്കിൽ രാമൻ എങ്കിലും നഗരത്തിൽ തന്നെ, വീട്ടിൽ വസിച്ച്, ഭിക്ഷയാൽ ജീവനം നയിച്ച് ധർമ്മകർമ്മങ്ങൾ അനുഷ്ഠിക്കുമായിരുന്നു.
It would have been better had I offered her my son as a slave. He would have lived on in the house by doing his duties and begging his food in the city.
The verse highlights the human cost when dharma is violated by coercion: even humiliating compromise seems preferable to unjust banishment. It implicitly critiques decisions driven by desire rather than righteousness.
Kausalya imagines alternative outcomes—anything that would keep Rama within reach—after learning he must leave for the forest.
Rama’s dutifulness is assumed: even in hardship (begging), he would still ‘do what must be done’ (duty), reflecting steadfast adherence to dharma.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.