Sukta 3
यस्मि॑न् विराट् प॑रमे॒ष्ठी प्र॒जाप॑तिर॒ग्निर्वै॑श्वान॒रः स॒ह प॒ङ्क्त्या श्रि॒तः । यः पर॑स्य प्रा॒णं प॑र॒मस्य॒ तेज॑ आद॒दे तस्य॑ दे॒वस्य॑। क्रु॒द्धस्यै॒तदागो॒ य ए॒वं वि॒द्वांसं॑ ब्राह्म॒णं जि॒नाति॑ । उद् वे॑पय रोहित॒ प्र क्षि॑णीहि ब्रह्म॒ज्यस्य॒ प्रति॑ मुञ्च॒ पाशा॑न्
yásmin virā́ṭ parameṣṭhī́ prajā́patiḥ agnír vaiśvānaráḥ sáha paṅktyā́ śritáḥ | yáḥ párasya prāṇáṃ paramásya téja ādadé tásya devásya | krúddhasyáitád ā́go yá eváṃ vidvā́ṃsaṃ brāhmaṇáṃ jinā́ti | úd vepaya rohita prá kṣiṇīhi brahmajyásya práti muñca pā́śān
In whom Virāj, Parameṣṭhin, Prajāpati, and Agni Vaiśvānara, together with Paṅkti, are established; who took to himself the breath of the Beyond, the splendour of the Highest—of that god, when angered, this is the offence: he who, knowing thus, wrongs a learned Brahmin. Up, make him tremble, O Rohita; waste him away: against the brahma-injurer loose forth the nooses.
വിരാട്, പരമേഷ്ഠി, പ്രജാപതി, അഗ്നി വൈശ്വാനരൻ—പങ്ക്തിയോടുകൂടെ—സ്ഥിതിചെയ്യുന്നവൻ; പരത്തിന്റെ പ്രാണവും പരമത്തിന്റെ തേജസ്സും തന്റെ ഉള്ളിൽ ഏറ്റെടുത്തവൻ—ആ ദേവൻ ക്രുദ്ധനായാൽ ഇതാണ് അപരാധം: ഇങ്ങനെ അറിഞ്ഞിട്ടും വിദ്യാവാൻ ബ്രാഹ്മണനെ പീഡിപ്പിക്കുന്നവൻ/അന്യായം ചെയ്യുന്നവൻ. ഹേ രോഹിത, എഴുന്നേറി അവനെ വിറപ്പിക്ക; അവനെ ക്ഷയിപ്പിക്ക; ബ്രഹ്മഹിംസകനോടു വിരോധമായി പാശങ്ങൾ വിട്ടുവിടുക.
The verse locates within a supreme principle the forms Virāj, Parameṣṭhin, Prajāpati, and Agni Vaiśvānara, together with Paṅkti. It says this god took the breath of the Beyond and the Highest splendor. Wronging a learned Brahmin is an offense against this angered god; Rohita is commanded to make the offender tremble, waste away, and be bound by nooses.
Ritual order (Agni, metre/Paṅkti, cosmic speech Virāj) is not separate from life-force (prāṇa) and brilliance (tejas). To harm the knower is to attack the integrative center that holds psyche and society together; the psyche then experiences fragmentation: fear, depletion, and constriction.
When the structures that integrate meaning—language, discipline, ethical authority, and inner fire—are violated, the violator’s own coherence collapses. True power is integrative, not exploitative.
To marshal the totality of ritual order (metre, fire, creator-forms) as a sanctioning force against one who harms a learned Brahmin.
यस्मिन् । विराट् । परमेष्ठी । प्रजापतिः । अग्निः । वैश्वानरः । सह । पङ्क्त्या । श्रितः । यः । परस्य । प्राणम् । परमस्य । तेजः । आददे । तस्य । देवस्य । क्रुद्धस्य । एतत् । आगः । यः । एवम् । विद्वांसम् । ब्राह्मणम् । जिनाति । उत् । वेपय । रोहित । प्र । क्षिणीहि । ब्रह्म-ज्यस्य । प्रति । मुञ्च । पाशान्
Sayana treats the cluster (Virāj, Parameṣṭhin, Prajāpati, Agni Vaiśvānara, Paṅkti) as names/forms resting in the supreme deity—an index of total ritual-cosmic integration (metre, fire, creator). ‘Ādadé’ is read as the deity’s appropriation of supreme prāṇa and tejas, hence unrivalled authority to diminish and bind. The refrain again specifies brahmajya as the actionable guilt.
Anukramaṇī-dependent; Atharvanic/Āṅgirasa complex
High-theology enumeration used for coercive protection: integrating metre (paṅkti), fire (vaiśvānara), and creator-forms into a punitive charm against brahmajya.
A hallmark Atharvanic move: the most ‘cosmic’ identifications are made operational for immediate social-ritual enforcement, showing theology as instrument.
Rohita executing a syncretic supreme deity (Virāj/Parameṣṭhin/Prajāpati/Agni Vaiśvānara)
Totalizer of ritual-cosmic functions: speech/metre, creation, fire, and fivefold order; withdraws prāṇa/tejas as sanction.
Potentially restorative through Vaiśvānara (digestive/transformative fire) when approached pacifically; here primarily punitive.
Strong protection of brahman and learned custodians via threat of tejas-driven wasting and pāśa-binding.
Mixed; paṅkti symbolism foregrounded (not necessarily strict Paṅkti metre)
Expanded first section with enumerations; then the fixed refrain imperatives. Paṅkti invoked as structural icon rather than strict metrical count.
Atharvanic ‘symbolic metre’: naming Paṅkti to confer fivefold completeness even when the line is not metrically paṅkti.
Ceremonial, list-like elevation → abrupt coercive cadence in the refrain.
Amplifies authority: the charm sounds like a cosmic legal decree backed by the whole ritual cosmos.
Kindle or attend the fire; recite naming Agni Vaiśvānara to ‘seat’ the sanction in the ritual hearth.
Mark a fivefold (paṅkti) arrangement (five offerings, five steps, or five knots) to embody ‘paṅktyā śritaḥ’.
Recite the appropriation line (‘párasya prāṇam… teja ādadé’) while drawing the hands inward, miming ‘seizing’ power.
Execute binding with a cord; at ‘muñca pāśān’ cast the nooses toward the offender’s direction or onto an effigy/name-token.
Close by circling the fire once (or touching the hearth) to seal the act under Agni’s witness.
Kauśika Sūtra: brahmajya protection/punishment; may be recited in proximity to the household fire (gārhapatya) or a consecrated flame when emphasizing Agni Vaiśvānara; binding acts with cord/noose remain central.
Atharvan/Brahman as ritual systems-integrator: he coordinates fire, metre-structure, and binding technology to enforce brahmanic protection.
Recited to protect a household’s ritual specialist/teacher; may be paired with tending the domestic fire (gārhapatya) as Vaiśvānara witness.
At the hearth/fire-time (evening agnihotra-style moments) or before formal dispute resolution.
Purohita/Atharvan reciter; fire-keeper maintains flame as ‘witness’.
Symbolic: light a lamp as Vaiśvānara; recite for ethical protection and restraint of slander/abuse.
Agni Vaiśvānara (ritual fire as instrument of sanction); Paṅkti (fivefold metrical/ritual structure); prāṇa; tejas; pāśa
Agni Vaiśvānara explicitly: ritual fire and universal digestive fire as sanctioning instrument.
Fire (agni) is the transforming judge; tejas is luminous authority; paṅkti is the fivefold completeness that makes the sanction ‘total’; pāśa is the mechanism of capture.
Vaiśvānara suggests digestive/agni principle; conceptual parallel to agni/tejas imbalance causing kṣaya (wasting), but here as punitive rhetoric.
‘Wasting’ as psychosocial collapse under sanction; ‘inner fire’ as stress physiology metaphor.
Brahma-injurer who wrongs a learned Brahmin.
To mobilize total ritual order (metre, fire, creator-forms) to punish and bind the brahmajya through trembling, wasting, and noose-restraint.
Theological totalization (who contains all) + claim of seized prāṇa/tejas + imperative curse + binding imagery (pāśa).
Attacks on priestly authority, ritual integrity, and sacred speech.
Integrate speech (virāj), will (tejas), and inner fire (vaiśvānara) into a single ethical center; contemplate ‘fivefold’ balance (paṅkti) in senses and actions.
manipura
Even breathing with gentle inner-heat awareness (agni-bhāvanā) without force; avoid aggressive kapalabhāti in raudra context.
A five-flamed inner fire at the navel radiating gold; a red perimeter (Rohita) outside; harmful impulses visualized as cords being tied and set down away from the heart.
Upright, sovereign composure.
Convert punitive energy into disciplined boundaries: speak truth, keep vows, tend inner fire through moderation; end with forgiveness practice to cool excess tejas.
Enumerations may be chanted in a steady, dignified contour; the refrain takes a sharper, higher-energy contour for imperatives.
Mark compounds clearly: agnír vaiśvānaráḥ; paṅktyā́ śritáḥ. Keep téjaḥ bright and crisp.
Majestic in the list; forceful in the refrain; keep consonants crisp for ‘binding’ effect.
If recited near fire, maintain ritual decorum (no anger-display); let the mantra carry the coercion, not the performer’s agitation.
7 times
Light/maintain a clean lamp or hearth-fire (Agni witness); Fivefold offering gesture (paṅkti) symbolically: five breaths or five moments of silence; Śānti recitation afterward to cool tejas
When sacred duties are disrupted: slander of teachers, sabotage of rituals, or abuse of trust in spiritual settings.
Before protective rites, before speaking a formal complaint, or when reaffirming ethical boundaries in a community.
Restoration of authority and order; psychological strengthening; deterrence against further violation.
Avoid escalation; seek reconciliation and justice; do not use to intimidate the innocent—pair with self-examination (did I harm brahman?).
The hymn’s ‘materiality’ is ritual infrastructure: fire (Agni), metre (Paṅkti), and energetic substances (prāṇa/tejas). These replace herbs as the carriers of efficacy in a juridical-punitive context.
It fuses Brahmin protection with the entire ritual cosmos: to harm a learned Brahmin is to affront the integrated system of creator, metre, and fire—thereby legitimating strong sanctions.
The enumerative theology (Virāj/Parameṣṭhin/Prajāpati) and explicit metrical-ritual self-reference (Paṅkti) are more developed than typical RV hymnody, reflecting later Atharvanic synthesis and proto-brāhmaṇa speculation.
Gopatha frequently grounds efficacy in correspondences among metre, deity, and rite: naming Virāj/Paṅkti/Agni is not descriptive but operative, assembling the ritual totality that authorizes binding (pāśa) and depletion (kṣaya) of the offender.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.