
Rishi: Vratya (mythic/cosmic subject; traditional attribution varies in ancillary lists)
Devata: Vratya / Prāṇa-functions (here Apāna) as cosmic principle
Chandas: Prose-like Atharvanic style (not a strict ṛgvedic meter; often treated as mixed/anuṣṭubh-adjacent in later catalogues)
AV 15.16 ສືບຕໍ່ການຄາດຄະເນກ່ຽວກັບວຣາຕຍະ ໂດຍການສອດຄ່ອງອາປານ (ລົມຫາຍໃຈທີ່ເຄື່ອນລົງ) ຂອງວຣາຕຍະ ເຂົ້າກັບຄວາມເປັນຈິງທາງພິທີກຳ ແລະ ປະຕິທິນ, ປ່ຽນສະລິວະວິທະຍາໃຫ້ກາຍເປັນຈັກວະວິທານ. ໂດຍການປະກາດສິ່ງຕ່າງໆ ເຊັ່ນ ອາມາວາສຍາ (ຄືນຂອງເດືອນໃໝ່), ຍັຊນະ (ການບູຊາ), ແລະ ທັກສິນາ (ຄ່າທຳນຽມຂອງປູຊາຈາ) ເປັນ "ສະມາຊິກອາປານ" ຂອງວຣາຕຍະ, ບົດສາດສະໜອງຄວາມສັກສິດໃຫ້ເວລາຊົ່ວຄາວ, ການກະທຳທາງພິທີກຳ, ແລະ ການມອບຂອງທີ່ເປັນພັນທະ ເປັນໜ້າທີ່ທາງຈັກວະທີ່ແທ້ຈິງ. ພະລັງຂອງມັນແມ່ນການຜະສົມຜະສານ: ມັນອະນຸຍາດຕຳແໜ່ງຂອງວຣາຕຍະ ພາຍໃນລະບຽບການບູຊາຂອງພຣາຮມັນ ໃນຂະນະທີ່ຢືນຢັນວ່າລົມຫາຍໃຈເອງແມ່ນເຄື່ອງຈັກຂອງພິທີກຳ ແລະ ຄວາມຊອບທຳທາງສັງຄົມ.
Mantra 1
तस्य॒ व्रात्य॑स्य ।योऽस्य प्रथ॒मोऽपा॒नः सा पौ॑र्णमा॒सी
ຂອງພຣະວຣາຕຍະນັ້ນ, ລົມຫາຍໃຈອາປານທຳອິດ - ນາງແມ່ນພ໌ຣນມາສີ, ເປັນດວງເດືອນເຕັມ.
Mantra 2
तस्य॒ व्रात्य॑स्य ।योऽस्य द्वि॒तीयो॑ऽपा॒नः साष्ट॑का
ຂອງວຣາຕຍະນັ້ນ: ລົມຫາຍໃຈອາປານອັນທີສອງຂອງລາວ - ນີ້ແມ່ນອັດຕະກາ
Mantra 3
तस्य॒ व्रात्य॑स्य ।योऽस्य तृ॒तीयो॑ऽपा॒नः सामा॑वा॒स्या
ຂອງວຣາຕຍະນັ້ນ: ລົມຫາຍໃຈອາປານອັນທີສາມຂອງລາວ - ນີ້ແມ່ນຄືນຂະໜາດໃໝ່
Mantra 4
तस्य॒ व्रात्य॑स्य । योऽस्य चतु॒र्थोऽपा॒नः सा श्र॒द्धा
ຂອງວຣາຕຍະນັ້ນ: ລົມຫາຍໃຈອາປານອັນທີສີ່ຂອງລາວ - ນີ້ແມ່ນຄວາມສັກສິດ
Mantra 5
तस्य॒ व्रात्य॑स्य । योऽस्य पञ्च॒मोऽपा॒नः सा दी॒क्षा
ຂອງວຣາຕຍະນັ້ນ: ລົມຫາຍໃຈອາປານອັນທີຫ້າຂອງລາວ - ນີ້ແມ່ນພິທີບໍລິສຸດ
Mantra 6
तस्य॒ व्रात्य॑स्य । योऽस्य ष॒ष्ठोऽपा॒नः स य॒ज्ञः
ຂອງວຣາຕຍະນັ້ນ: ລົມຫາຍໃຈອາປານອັນທີຫົກຂອງລາວ - ນີ້ແມ່ນການບູຊາຍັດສະວະ
Mantra 7
तस्य॒ व्रात्य॑स्य । योऽस्य सप्त॒मोऽपा॒नस्ता इ॒मा दक्षि॑णाः
ຂອງພຣະວຣາຕຍະນັ້ນ: ສິ່ງທີ່ເປັນລະດັບທີເຈັດຂອງພຣະອົງ ຄື ອາປານະ ລົມຫາຍໃຈລົງ ນັ້ນແມ່ນຄ່າທາງບຸນຂອງປາຫຼວງເຫຼົ່ານີ້
Begins in catalogic ‘bandhu’ mode: “Of that Vratya…” introducing apāna as a structured set of internal members.
Not a petitionary prayer so much as a theological installation: to establish that apāna’s enumerated ‘parts’ are identical with authoritative ritual and temporal powers (e.g., Amāvāsyā, Yajña, Dakṣiṇā).
Efficacy is asserted by identity: once the external institution is declared to be the Vratya’s apāna-member, it becomes cosmically necessary and ritually unassailable.
Concludes by anchoring obligation and recompense (dakṣiṇā) within the prāṇic-cosmic body of the Vratya, sealing social-ritual legitimacy through a final identification.
tā imā dakṣiṇāḥ
Rajakarmani / Vratya (socio-ritual theology; cosmological identifications)
Ritual and social integration of the Vratya (and by extension liminal groups/conditions) into the sacrificial system; doctrinal authorization of yajña and dakṣiṇā as cosmically grounded necessities; stabilization of liminal time (new moon) through prāṇic correspondences.
Ritual specialists and patrons working with Vratya-related rites or social integration; Atharvanic reciters framing legitimacy, obligation (dakṣiṇā), and calendrical liminality within a cosmic theology.
The Vratya is treated not merely as a social outsider but as a totalizing cosmic figure whose internal prāṇic functions correspond to external ritual institutions and temporal thresholds. Apāna here is the organizing prāṇa: the ‘downward’ current that governs elimination, grounding, descent, and the settling/placing of offerings—hence its natural linkage to liminal nights, sacrificial structure, and the material ‘settling’ of dakṣiṇā.
To present apāna as the Vratya’s operative cosmic limb and to legitimate key ritual realities—especially Amāvāsyā, Yajña, and Dakṣiṇā—as necessary emanations of that prāṇic order, thereby validating the rite and the giver’s obligations.
Especially apt at liminal calendrical moments (notably Amāvāsyā) or whenever a Vratya-integration/legitimation frame is ritually required.
Dakṣiṇā (priestly fee/gift)
Select the dakṣiṇā according to capacity and custom; keep it set apart and ritually ‘clean.’ During/after recitation, dedicate and transfer it with the understanding that it embodies an apāna-bandhu (a cosmically grounded function) rather than a secular payment.
Here the Vratya is treated as a cosmic figure, not only a social category. The hymn speaks of the Vratya’s inner breaths (especially apāna) as identical with major ritual and temporal powers.
The sukta uses bandhu logic: inner physiology mirrors outer cosmos. By saying a particular apāna ‘is’ Amāvāsyā or ‘is’ Yajña, it makes liminal time and sacrifice part of a single cosmic-bodily system that can be ritually affirmed.
It means the priestly fee is presented as a necessary, power-bearing element of the rite—cosmically grounded rather than optional. Giving dakṣiṇā becomes a sacral act that completes and legitimates the ritual order.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.