The Disruption of Dakṣa’s Sacrifice, the Hari-Hara Conflict, and the Establishment of Rudra’s Sacrificial Share
Pūrva Bhāga · Genealogical & Deva–Asura Narrative Cycle (Dakṣa–Rudra Episode)
एवमुक्त्वा तदा दक्षस्तां कन्यां ब्रह्मसन्निधौ । ददौ रुद्राय महते गौरीं परमशोभनाम् ॥ २१.८२ ॥
evam uktvā tadā dakṣas tāṃ kanyāṃ brahmasannidhau | dadau rudrāya mahate gaurīṃ paramaśobhanām || 21.82 ||
evamuktvA tadA dakShastAM kanyAM brahmasannidhau | dadau rudrAya mahate gaurIM paramashobhanAm || 21.82 ||
ครั้นกล่าวดังนี้แล้ว ท้าวทักษะได้ถวายธิดานั้น คือพระคุรีผู้รุ่งเรืองยิ่ง ต่อพระรุทระผู้ยิ่งใหญ่ ณ เบื้องพระพักตร์พระพรหมา
Varāha
Saṃskāras gain authority through proper procedure and recognized witnessing, aligning personal bonds with cosmic order.
Treat life-transitions (marriage, vows, initiations) as dharmic acts: perform them with due rite, consent, and accountable witnesses.
Kanyādāna is performed in Brahmā’s presence, framing marriage as a sanctioned, ritually witnessed alliance.
Properly witnessed and ritually grounded marriage sustains social-cosmic order; neglect of rite/witness undermines dharmic legitimacy.
Varāha Purāṇa 21.21.83-85 (continuation of marriage acceptance and allotment of abode)
It preserves a Purāṇic narrative motif in which a formal marriage-gift (kanyādāna) is performed publicly, here explicitly “in the presence of Brahmā,” reflecting how Purāṇas frame social rites through mythic authority figures.
No geographic toponym appears in this verse; the setting is indicated only as brahmasannidhau (“in Brahmā’s presence”), a narrative/ritual context rather than a place-name.
The verse primarily conveys a cultural-ritual principle: the conferral of a marriage alliance is portrayed as a formally witnessed act, emphasizing public legitimacy and accountability in social rites.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.