Valmiki Ramayana 2.9.60: Ayodhya Kanda, Sarga 9, Shloka 60
मन्थराप्रेरणा · वरद्वय-स्मरणं च
Manthara’s Provocation and the Recalling of Two Boons
Setting: Ayodhyā (royal palace; queen’s quarters)Political turn toward Rāma’s exile (implied)
अथो पुनस्तां महिषीं महीक्षितो वचोभिरत्यर्थमहापराक्रमैः ।
उवाच कुब्जा भरतस्य मातरं हितं वचो राममुपेत्य चाहितम् ॥६०॥
atho punas tāṃ mahiṣīṃ mahīkṣito vacobhir atyartha-mahā-parākramaiḥ |
uvāca kubjā bharatasya mātaraṃ hitaṃ vaco rāmam upetya cāhitam ||60||
പിന്നെയും ആ കുബ്ജ രാജാവിന്റെ മഹിഷിയായ, ഭരതന്റെ മാതാവായ ആ രാജ്ഞിയോടു അത്യന്തം പ്രബലമായ വാക്കുകളാൽ സംസാരിച്ചു—ഭരതന് ഹിതമെന്നു തോന്നിച്ചെങ്കിലും, രാമനെ സംബന്ധിച്ചതിനാൽ അഹിതകരമായ വാക്കുകൾ.
Sandhi Notes
- अथो = अथ + उ (निपात-सन्धिः)
- पुनस्ताम् = पुनः + ताम् (विसर्ग-लोपः)
- ताङ् = ताम् (अनुस्वार/ङ्-लेखनभेदः)
- महीक्षितोवचोभिः = महीक्षितः + वचोभिः (विसर्ग-लोपः)
- वचोभिरत्यर्थ... = वचोभिः + अत्यर्थ... (विसर्ग-लोपः)
- ...पराक्रमैः उवाच = ...पराक्रमैः + उवाच (विसर्ग-लोपः)
- मातरंहितं = मातरम् + हितम् (म् + ह्)
- राममुपेत्य = रामम् + उपेत्य (म् + उ)
- चाहितम् = च + अहितम् (स्वर-सन्धिः)
Addressing queen Kaikeyi, the mother of Bharata, with extremely powerful words, that hunchback again made these utterances beneficial to Bharata and detrimental to Rama:
The teaching
Words that masquerade as ‘hita’ while intending ‘ahita’ are the subtlest form of adharma—because they recruit conscience to serve desire.
Duties in tension
- Seeking ‘benefit’ for one’s own vs impartial justice of succession
- Truthful counsel vs manipulative rhetoric
- Protecting the righteous (Rāma) vs undermining him for gain
- Ethical theme
- Nīti / rājadharma (counsel ethics)
For your practice
Satya-vāk practice: align speech, intention, and outcome; beware moral rebranding of harm as ‘good’.
Mood and themes
- Rasa
- Raudra (fury), with Bhayanaka (fear)
- Mood
- Forceful, calculating, menacing
Themes
- Itihasa
- Ethics
- Speech ethics (vāk-dharma)
- Satya vs. persuasive harm
- Court intrigue
Māyā operates through naming: calling harm ‘benefit’ veils reality; avidyā re-labels adharma as dharma.
Chāndogya’s satya principle: speech should align with reality; here vāṅ-mithyātva (false speech) drives suffering.
- Manthara and Kaikeyi
- Counselor intensifying persuasion; ‘hitam’ framed advice
- Kaikeyi and Bharata
- Mother seeking advantage for son (mixed)
- Manthara and Rama
- Schemer targeting Rāma’s interests
- Kaikeyi and Rama
- Stepmother positioned against Rāma’s welfare
- Kaikeyi and Dasharatha
- Consort implicated in political harm
Rāmāyaṇa 2.9.6-2.9.59 (Mantharā’s persuasion sequence); Rāmāyaṇa 2.10-2.11 (Kaikeyī’s demands articulated to Daśaratha)
Mahābhārata: ‘hita’ counsel that is actually ‘ahita’ (e.g., Duryodhana’s circle)
Rāmāyaṇa 2.12-2.14 (consequences: Daśaratha’s collapse; coronation halted)
Anuṣṭup (with kāvya-like compound density in pāda)
Commanding
Firm, clipped delivery; stress on contrasts ‘hitam… ahitam’
FAQs
It underscores vāk-dharma: powerful speech must be measured by truth and universal welfare; ‘benefit’ to one party achieved through harm to the righteous is ethically suspect.
The narration frames Mantharā’s renewed argumentation: she speaks forcefully to steer Kaikeyī toward Bharata’s enthronement and against Rāma.
The verse spotlights rhetorical power (parākrama in speech), but as a morally ambivalent capacity when severed from dharma.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Valmiki Ramayana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
