Valmiki Ramayana 2.21.52: Ayodhya Kanda, Sarga 21, Shloka 52
अयोध्याकाण्डे एकविंशः सर्गः · Lakṣmaṇa’s militant counsel and Rāma’s dharma
based persuasion of Kausalyā
Spoken by Kausalya to RamaSetting: Ayodhyā palacePlaces named: svarga (heaven), jīvaloka (world of living beings)Pre-departure; emotional peak of separation anxiety
किं जीवितेनेह विना त्वया मे लोकेन वा किं स्वधयाऽमृतेन ।
श्रेयो मुहूर्तं तव सन्निधानं ममेह कृत्स्नादपि जीवलोकात् ॥५२॥
kiṃ jīvitena iha vinā tvayā me lokena vā kiṃ svadhayā amṛtena |
śreyo muhūrtaṃ tava sannidhānaṃ mama iha kṛtsnād api jīvalokāt ||52||
หากไร้เจ้า ชีวิตของฉันที่นี่จะมีค่าอันใด? สวรรค์จะมีประโยชน์อะไร พิธีบูชาบรรพชนหรือแม้แต่น้ำอมฤตก็มีค่าอันใด? สำหรับฉัน เพียงชั่วขณะได้อยู่ใกล้เจ้า ยังประเสริฐกว่าทั้งโลกของผู้มีชีวิตนี้เมื่อไร้เจ้า
Sandhi Notes
- Sandhi resolved: जीवितेनेह → जीवितेन + इह
- त्वया मे → त्वया + मे
- स्वधयाऽमृतेन → स्वधया + अमृतेन
- श्रेयो मुहूर्तं → श्रेयः + मुहूर्तम् (visarga before m)
- जीवलोकात् → जीव-लोकात् (compound)
What is the purpose of my life in this world without you? What purpose do I have with the other world or with the oblations (offered to manes) or with nectar (availble to the gods). I would prefer one moment in your company to the whole world of living beings (without you).
The teaching
Grief can invert value-systems: even heaven and ritual merit feel empty when love is threatened—revealing the power of attachment.
Duties in tension
- Rāma’s duty to depart for dharma/obedience
- Mother’s emotional dependence and expectation of filial proximity
- Ritual/otherworldly aims vs immediate relational duty
- Ethical theme
- Attachment vs duty (sneha vs dharma)
For your practice
Viraha-bhāva contemplation (though here maternal): recognizing how attachment binds; transforming it into selfless love and surrender is the sādhanic challenge.
Mood and themes
- Rasa
- Karuna (compassion), with Shringara (love)
- Mood
- Desolate, clinging, all-consuming
Themes
- Dharma
- Satya
- Ethics
- Maternal grief
- Attachment
- Renunciation tension
Devaluation of svarga and even amṛta mirrors vairāgya, but here driven by grief/attachment—showing how the same language can arise from bondage (rāga) rather than liberation.
Chāndogya/Bṛhadāraṇyaka critiques of svarga as non-ultimate; yet the verse twists it into maternal viraha—highlighting the difference between vairāgya and śoka-born negation.
- Kausalya and Rama
- Mother’s intense attachment; valuing son’s presence over life/heaven (desperate love and grief)
- Kausalya and Ancestors
- Pitṛ-tarpaṇa/śrāddha obligations dismissed as meaningless without son (renunciatory despair)
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.21.53 (Rāma’s intensified inner burning on hearing lament); Mahābhārata: Gāndhārī/Kuntī laments valuing sons over kingdom/heaven (thematic parallels); Rāmacaritamānasa Ayodhyākāṇḍa (maternal/parental viraha laments; thematic parallel)
Vedic svadhā (pitṛ-offering) terminology
Ayodhyākāṇḍa: repeated motif—Ayodhyā’s citizens/elders valuing Rāma over prosperity and even life
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Grieving
Ati-vilambita with plaintive descent on "विना त्वया" and "मुहूर्तं"
FAQs
The verse dramatizes the conflict between personal attachment and dharmic duty; it shows how powerful love can challenge acceptance of a righteous course.
Kausalya pleads emotionally, declaring that neither this world nor the next has value for her without Rama.
Deep maternal devotion—though it also highlights the human difficulty of detachment when dharma demands separation.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Valmiki Ramayana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
