Dialogue on the Ethical Limits of Subsistence and the Five Great Sacrifices
Dharmavyādha, Mātaṅga, and Prasanna
एवं सञ्चिन्त्य मातङ्गः प्रसन्नं प्रति सोद्यतः । उवाच तस्य पितरं प्रसन्नायार्ज्जुनीं भवान् । गृहाण तपतां श्रेष्ठ स्वयं दत्तां महात्मने ॥ ८.९ ॥
evaṃ saṃcintya mātaṅgaḥ prasannaṃ prati sodyataḥ | uvāca tasya pitaraṃ prasannāyārjunīṃ bhavān | gṛhāṇa tapatāṃ śreṣṭha svayaṃ dattāṃ mahātmane || 8.9 ||
ครั้นไตร่ตรองดังนี้ มตังคะจึงรีบเข้าไปหาประสันนะ แล้วกล่าวแก่บิดาของเขาว่า “ข้าแต่ผู้ประเสริฐในหมู่นักบำเพ็ญตบะ ขอท่านจงรับ ‘อรชุนี’ ผู้ยินดีพร้อม ซึ่งข้ามอบให้ด้วยตนเอง เพื่อมหาตมะประสันนะ”
Mātaṅga
It preserves a Purāṇic narrative formula in which social alliances and ethical legitimacy are framed through consent (prasannā) and formal transfer (dattā), reflecting how later Sanskrit texts encode customary norms within story cycles.
No geographic toponym appears in this verse; the passage is primarily interpersonal and ritual-social rather than site-specific.
The verse foregrounds deliberation (saṃcintya) and consensual disposition (prasannā) as prerequisites for a socially consequential act of giving/acceptance (gṛhāṇa, dattām), emphasizing responsible decision-making within established norms.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.