Nārāyaṇa as the Sacrificial Principle, Analysis of the Three Guṇas, and the Account of Delusion-Doctrines
रजसा तमसा युक्तः सोऽपि मां त्वसृजत् प्रभुः । यत्सत्त्वं स हरिर्देवो यो हरिस्तत्परं पदम् ॥ ७०.१८ ॥
rajasā tamasā yuktaḥ so 'pi māṃ tv asṛjat prabhuḥ | yat sattvaṃ sa harir devo yo haris tat paraṃ padam || 70.18 ||
พระผู้เป็นเจ้าผู้ประกอบด้วยรชัสและตมัสนั้น ได้ทรงสร้างข้าพเจ้าด้วยเช่นกัน สิ่งที่เป็นสัตตวะนั้นคือพระหริผู้เป็นเทพ และพระหรินั่นเองคือปรมบท
Varāha (default dialogue frame; speaker not explicit in excerpt)
It reflects a Purāṇic synthesis of cosmological creation-language with guṇa-theory (rajas, tamas, sattva), a conceptual vocabulary also prominent in classical Indian philosophical traditions.
No geographic location is specified in this verse; the content is primarily cosmological and theological.
Rather than a direct moral rule, the verse presents a philosophical hierarchy: sattva is associated with clarity and the divine principle (Hari), implying an evaluative preference for lucid discernment over states dominated by rajas and tamas.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.