The Manifestation of Māyā as Durgā/Kātyāyanī and the Slaying of Vaitrāsura
जलफेनेन निहतस्तस्मिँल्लयमवाप्नुयात् । पुनर्ब्रह्मान्वयाज्जातः सिन्धुद्वीपेति संज्ञितः । स तेपे परमं तीव्रं शक्रवैरमनुस्मरन् ॥ २८.६ ॥
jalaphenena nihatas tasmiṁl layam avāpnuyāt | punar brahmānvayāj jātaḥ sindhudvīpeti saṁjñitaḥ | sa tepe paramaṁ tīvraṁ śakravairam anusmaran || 28.6 ||
เมื่อถูกสังหารด้วยฟองแห่งสายน้ำ เขาก็เข้าสู่ความสลาย ณ ที่นั้น ต่อมาได้เกิดใหม่ในสายวงศ์ของพรหมา และเป็นที่รู้จักว่า “สินธุทวีป” ระลึกถึงความเป็นศัตรูกับศักระ เขาจึงบำเพ็ญตบะอย่างยิ่งยวด
Varāha (default, speaker not explicit in excerpt)
It illustrates a common Purāṇic narrative pattern—death, dissolution (laya), and rebirth—used to explain the origin of a named figure and to anchor sacred-geographic terminology (e.g., Sindhu-dvīpa) within a genealogical framework.
Sindhu-dvīpa is presented as a toponymic designation. In scholarly discussions, “Sindhu” broadly relates to the Indus region; however, this verse alone does not securely fix a single modern identification without additional contextual verses.
The verse foregrounds the disciplined pursuit of tapas (austerity) as a means of purposeful transformation, while also depicting the potentially destabilizing role of sustained enmity (vaira) as a motivating force within the narrative.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.