मन्थराप्रेरणा · वरद्वय-स्मरणं च
Manthara’s Provocation and the Recalling of Two Boons
Spoken by Manthara to KaikeyiSetting: Ayodhyā palace (antaḥpura)Places named: Ayodhyā
एवमुक्ता तया देव्या मन्थरा पापदर्शिनी ।
रामार्थमुपहिंसन्ती कुब्जा वचनमब्रवीत् ॥१०॥
evamuktā tayā devyā mantharā pāpadarśinī |
rāmārtham upahiṃsantī kubjā vacanam abravīt ||10||
Tak przemówiona przez królową, Mantharā, garbata kobieta o złym spojrzeniu, odpowiedziała, zdecydowana zaszkodzić sprawie Rāmy.
Thus addressed by the queen (Kaikeyi), the evil-eyed hunchback, Manthara, said with the intention to damage Rama's interest.
A kingdom’s downfall begins when rulers accept counsel rooted in envy and harm; discern advisers by their intent toward dharma.
Practice of viveka: examine motives behind speech; cultivate satya and ahiṃsā in counsel.
Distorted buddhi (crooked counsel) veils dharma; avidyā expresses as manipulative speech.
Contrast to ‘satyam vada’ ethos—here speech is turned toward harm (ethical echo by inversion).
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.8-2.14 (Mantharā’s persuasive strategy); Rāmacaritamānasa, Ayodhyākāṇḍa (Mantharā-Kaikeyī samvāda parallels in intent and outcome)
Nīti literature theme: ruin from wicked advisers (conceptual; e.g., pañcatantra-like motif)
Ayodhyākāṇḍa: the chain leading to the two boons and exile order
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Solemn
Madhyama (middle register)
Dharma rejects speech driven by malice; intentional harm to the righteous (here, Rāma’s welfare) is presented as adharma.
Mantharā responds to Kaikeyī, positioning her counsel as a deliberate attempt to derail Rāma’s prospects.
The verse foregrounds the opposite of virtue—goodwill and truthfulness—by depicting calculated ill-intent and corrosive counsel.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.