Sukta 29
इन्द्रे॑ण द॒त्तो वरु॑णेन शि॒ष्टो म॒रुद्भि॑रु॒ग्रः प्रहि॑तो न॒ आग॑न्। ए॒ष वां॑ द्यावापृथिवी उ॒पस्थे॒ मा क्षु॑ध॒न्मा तृ॑षत्
índreṇa dattó váruṇena śiṣṭó marúdbhir ugráḥ práhito na ā́gan | eṣá vā́m dyāvāpṛthivī upásthe mā́ kṣúdhān mā́ tṛ́ṣat ||
Bestowed by Indra, ordered by Varuṇa, fierce, by the Maruts sent forth, it hath come unto us. This (charge) is in your lap, O Heaven and Earth: let it not hunger, let it not thirst.
Darowana przez Indrę, rozkazana przez Warunę, groźna, przez Marutów posłana, przybyła do nas. Ta opieka spoczywa w waszym łonie, O Niebo i Ziemia: niech nie łaknie, niech nie pragnie.
A consecrated ‘charge’ comes—given by Indra, commanded by Varuṇa, sent by the fierce Maruts. Placed in the lap of Heaven and Earth, it is adjured: let it not hunger, let it not thirst.
Installing a protective program in the psyche/body: authority (Indra), moral order (Varuṇa), and mobilizing force (Maruts) deliver a safeguard. The ‘lap of Heaven-and-Earth’ is the felt ground of safety; from it arises freedom from anxious scarcity (hunger/thirst).
Security is both cosmic and practical: when power, order, and vitality cooperate, basic needs are met and fear of deprivation subsides.
To install a consecrated protective agency so that hunger and thirst do not afflict the beneficiary (patient/household), ensuring bodily sustenance and stability.
इन्द्रेण । दत्तः । वरुणेन । शिष्टः । मरुद्भिः । उग्रः । प्रहितः । नः । आगन् । एषः । वाम् । द्यावा-पृथिवी । उपस्थे । मा । क्षुधन् । मा । तृषत्
Sāyaṇa construes ‘eṣaḥ’ as the present protective implement/agency (commonly an amulet, herb, or consecrated object) that is ‘given’ by Indra (strength), ‘enjoined’ by Varuṇa (ṛta and restraint), and ‘sent’ by the Maruts (driving-away force). ‘In the lap of Dyāvā-Pṛthivī’ marks secure emplacement and cosmic legitimation. The closing prohibitions are apotropaic: hunger and thirst are treated as afflicting powers to be excluded from the patient/household (or from the consecrated object that sustains them).
Unknown/Anukramaṇī-variant (Atharvanic protective deployment)
Protective installation rites preventing deprivation and instability; commissioning a ‘sent’ protective agency (often amulet-like).
Illustrates Atharvanic logic of ‘authorized protection’: blessings are not vague wishes but a transmitted, commanded force placed into a locus (dyāvāpṛthivī-upastha).
Dyāvāpṛthivī with Indra, Varuṇa, Maruts as empowerers
Indra provides potency, Varuṇa provides lawful containment, Maruts provide mobilizing protection; Heaven-and-Earth provide the stable ‘seat’ for the charge.
Supports recovery by preventing depletion and ensuring access to sustenance/hydration; reduces stress-driven ‘burning’ and weakness.
Wards off hunger/thirst (literal and symbolic), guarding household supplies and bodily stability.
First segment triṣṭubh tendency; closing ‘mā kṣudhan mā tṛṣat’ functions as compact apotropaic refrain
Atharvanic charms often end with short prohibitions that override metrical regularity for performative force.
Authoritative arrival → secure placement → sharp protective prohibition.
Feels like sealing an amulet: a firm ‘arrival’ followed by a locking command.
Prepare the protective medium (amulet/charged substance) associated with the hymn’s performance.
Recite the mantra while presenting/placing the object as ‘arrived’ (ā́gan) for the beneficiary.
Seat or place the object (or the beneficiary) upon a ritually defined ‘lap’/support (often a prepared seat, earth-contact, or domestic locus), verbally identifying it with Dyāvā-Pṛthivī’s upastha.
Utter the prohibitions ‘mā kṣudhān, mā tṛṣat’ as explicit warding commands, sealing the rite.
Conclude with customary protective gestures (touching/tying/binding, as appropriate to the object), maintaining the object on the person or in the dwelling.
Kauśika Sūtra: application within the AV 2.29 complex (protective/paustika deployment; exact sūtra numbering varies by edition—consult Bloomfield’s Kauśika for the karman keyed to AV 2.29).
The Atharvan/Brahman officiant consecrates and ‘dispatches’ the protective agency through mantra, performs the placement (upastha) act, and seals the apotropaic prohibitions against hunger and thirst.
Recite while placing a blessed item (food vessel, water pot, or amulet) in a central household spot; or over a child/patient to prevent depletion.
Before travel, during drought/scarcity anxiety, or when caring for a weak person.
Elder/priest performs the ‘placement’ (upastha imagery) and speaks the prohibitions as the seal.
Used as a household prayer for food/water sufficiency and for patients with poor intake.
Consecrated protective object (e.g., amulet/mani or charged substance implied by ‘eṣaḥ’); Cosmic ‘lap’ of Heaven-and-Earth as ritual emplacement (symbolic locus)
Implied by ‘eṣaḥ’ as a delivered ‘charge’—often interpretable as a consecrated object/mani in Atharvanic praxis.
Implicit via ‘tṛṣ’ (thirst) and the broader sustenance frame; not explicitly āpaḥ here.
Protection is object-like: it can arrive, be placed, and then function as a barrier against depletion; Heaven-and-Earth are the ultimate container ensuring continuity.
Starvation/dehydration states; convalescent weakness; also anxiety of scarcity affecting appetite and vitality.
Consecrated protection is ‘sent’ and then ‘seated’ in the cosmic lap; the final prohibitions act as a verbal barrier against depletion.
Prevention of dhātu-kṣaya (tissue depletion) and vāta-aggravated dryness; maintaining kleda (moisture) and bala (strength).
Food security and hydration support; stress reduction around scarcity; supportive care preventing undernourishment.
Beneficiary and/or household stores/food supply.
Pacify and prevent hunger and thirst from afflicting the beneficiary/household; stabilize sustenance.
Commissioning lineage of authority (Indra→Varuṇa→Maruts) + emplacement in dyāvāpṛthivī + apotropaic negation (‘mā…mā…’).
Deprivation, famine-like conditions, wasting, anxiety-driven depletion.
Food and water sufficiency; stability of provisions.
Cultivating a felt sense of being held by Earth-and-Sky; releasing scarcity fear.
Muladhara (security) and Anahata (being held).
Box-breath (4-4-4-4) with silent ‘mā kṣudhan’ on hold, ‘mā tṛṣat’ on exhale.
A protective sphere seated at the lower abdomen, anchored to earth and open to sky; dryness and hunger dissolve at its boundary.
Safety and sufficiency (saṃtoṣa).
Recite 7 times while touching the ground (or sitting grounded), then drink water mindfully to embody ‘no thirst’.
Authoritative rise on the lineage of empowerment; clipped, sealing cadence on the final prohibitions.
Give weight to ‘ugraḥ prahitaḥ’; then slow slightly before ‘upasthe’; finish with firm, short ‘mā kṣudhan mā tṛṣat’.
Commanding but not harsh; final words crisp.
The closing ‘mā…mā…’ functions as the apotropaic seal; avoid elongating it melodically—keep it decisive.
7 times
Household anxiety about provisions; patient not eating/drinking; travel or seasonal scarcity periods.
Before meals or when placing food/water stores; during caregiving to encourage intake and stability.
A sense of safety and sufficiency; supportive ritual framing for nourishment and hydration.
Address practical causes of poor intake (medical evaluation, hydration plans, food access).
No explicit plant is named in this verse; instead, ‘eṣaḥ’ functions as a deictic placeholder for the charged medium (often an amulet or prepared substance in Atharvanic praxis). The mantra supplies the object with a triadic authorization—Indra (force), Varuṇa (normative binding/ṛta), Maruts (expulsive violence)—so that it operates as a sustenance-protecting talisman against the quasi-demonic conditions of hunger and thirst.
Efficacy is framed as deriving from high divine authorities and mediated by correct ‘ordination’ (śiṣṭa) and dispatch (prahita), implying a specialist operator who knows how to install protection within cosmic order. Hunger and thirst are not merely economic facts but ritually addressable afflictions, suggesting a household religion where the priestly expert manages vulnerabilities of subsistence through sanctioned speech-acts.
The diction is largely Rigvedic (Indra/Varuṇa/Maruts; aorist ā́gan; prohibitive mā + injunctive-like forms). The Atharvanic tendency appears in the pragmatic deictic ‘eṣaḥ’ as a ritual object-in-hand and in the direct apotropaic prohibitions against embodied privations (kṣudh, tṛṣ), foregrounding domestic-magical application more explicitly than many RV parallels.
The Gopatha Brāhmaṇa generally rationalizes Atharvanic mantras as effective through correct brahman (sacred formulation), proper deployment (prayoga), and alignment with cosmic supports (notably Dyāvā-Pṛthivī as foundational stability). In that frame, this verse’s efficacy rests on (1) authoritative divine commissioning, (2) emplacement in the cosmic ‘lap’ (a stability trope), and (3) the performative negation of hunger/thirst as hostile forces removable by brahman.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.