यौवराज्य-प्रस्तावः
Proposal for Rāma’s Installation as Heir-Apparent
Spoken by King DaśarathaSetting: Ayodhyā (royal assembly)
कथं नु मयि धर्मेण पृथिवीमनुशासति ।
भवन्तो द्रष्टुमिच्छन्ति युवराजं ममात्मजम् ॥२५॥
kathaṃ nu mayi dharmeṇa pṛthivīm anuśāsati |
bhavanto draṣṭum icchanti yuvarājaṃ mamātmajam ||25||
ನಾನು ಧರ್ಮಾನುಸಾರವಾಗಿ ಭೂಮಿಯನ್ನು ಆಳುತ್ತಿರುವಾಗ, ನೀವು ಏಕೆ ನನ್ನ ಆತ್ಮಜ ಪುತ್ರನನ್ನು ಯುವರಾಜನಾಗಿ ನೋಡಲು ಬಯಸುತ್ತೀರಿ?
When the earth is being ruled righteously by me why indeed you intend to see my son as prince regent?
A ruler must balance present competence with future stability; succession should be justified by dharma and prajā-hita, not impulse.
Invites reflection on svadharma: doing one’s role well while preparing responsibly for transition.
The ‘earth’ as field of duty (kṣetra) entrusted to the ruler; governance as karma-yoga when aligned with dharma.
Kingship as protection of order (ṛta/dharma) echoes the Vedic-ṛta background that Upaniṣads inherit as satya-ṛta orientation.
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.2.24 (doubt and request for truth); Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.2.26 (people answer: Rāma has many virtues)
Mahābhārata Śānti Parva: rājadharma—king as protector and administrator of the earth
Ayodhyākāṇḍa later: consequences of succession decisions and dharma-sankata around exile (contrast with this orderly inquiry)
Anuṣṭup
Commanding
Madhyama (middle register)
Dharma is framed as present good governance: Daśaratha implies that succession should be justified by the kingdom’s welfare, not mere impatience. The verse invites ethical reasoning about when and why power should be transferred.
Daśaratha questions the assembly’s urgency, noting that his current rule is dharmic, and asks their rationale for installing the heir now.
Daśaratha’s self-awareness and accountability—he measures the request against the standard of dharmic administration.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.