अयोध्यायाः पौरविलापः
Lament of the Citizens of Ayodhya on Rama’s Absence
Spoken by Citizens of AyodhyaSetting: Ayodhya
धिगस्तु खलु निद्रां तां ययाऽपहृतचेतसः ।
नाद्य पश्यामहे रामं पृथूरस्कं महाभुजम् ॥४॥
dhig astu khalu nidrāṃ tāṃ yayā ’pahṛtacetasaḥ |
na adya paśyāmahe rāmaṃ pṛthūraskaṃ mahābhujam ||4||
น่าติเตียนนักหนาแก่ความหลับนั้น ที่ได้ลักเอาสติของเราไป; วันนี้เรามิได้เห็นพระราม ผู้ทรงอุระกว้างและพระกรอันเกรียงไกร
Fie on this sleep which robbed us of our senses. We are unable to see (now) that broad-chested and mighty-armed Rama.
Pramāda makes one miss the moment of dharma; wakefulness and readiness are forms of devotion and civic responsibility.
Encourages wakeful remembrance and promptness in service (sevā) rather than tamasic delay.
Nidrā as a tamasic veil: when consciousness is ‘stolen’, one misses the sat (the worthy object); echoes the discipline of wakefulness in sādhanā.
Jāgrat–svapna contrast: missing the ‘seen’ due to sleep resonates with Upaniṣadic analysis of states and the need to awaken to truth.
Prātaḥkāla (implied by ‘today we do not see’ after sleep)
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.47.3 (how could he leave?)
A-pramāda praised in dharma literature (general resonance with Upaniṣadic/Gītā emphasis on vigilance)
Ayodhyākāṇḍa: citizens’ regret at not accompanying/seeing Rama at departure
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Grieving
Slightly commanding accent on ‘dhig astu’ then softening into lament
It warns against negligence: failing in vigilance can lead to irreversible loss, especially when one’s duty is to uphold and support dhārmic order.
The citizens reproach their own sleep/heedlessness as they realize Rāma has gone and they can no longer see him.
Rāma’s heroic strength is highlighted (broad-chested, mighty-armed), underscoring why his absence feels unbearable.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.