मन्थराप्रवेशः · Manthara Observes Ayodhya and Incites Kaikeyi
Spoken by Manthara to KaikeyiSetting: Ayodhyā (inner palace quarters)
साऽस्म्यगाधे भये मग्ना दुःखशोकसमन्विता ।
दह्यमानाऽनलेनेव त्वद्धितार्थमिहागता ॥२१॥
sā 'smy agādhe bhaye magnā duḥkhaśokasamanvitā |
dahyamānā 'nalen eva tvaddhitārtham ihāgatā ||21||
నేను అగాధమైన భయములో మునిగిపోయి, దుఃఖశోకాలతో నిండిపోయి, అగ్నిలో దగ్ధమైనట్లుగా మండుతూ—నీ హితార్థమే ఇక్కడికి వచ్చాను।
Plunged in unfathomable fear and stricken with grief and tears I am here seeking your well-being and yet consumed as though by fire.
Emotional theatrics can masquerade as ‘concern’; discernment (viveka) is required before acting on another’s fear.
Practice of witnessing emotions without being consumed—turning ‘burning’ into mindful observation; supports japa during agitation.
‘Burning in fire’ mirrors adhyāsa-tāpa: the mind scorched by imagined loss; fear arises from identification with status rather than Self.
Kaṭha Upaniṣad’s warning that the unsteady mind is carried away by sense-objects—here, by power and security—echoes in the imagery of being plunged and burning.
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.7.24 (Mantharā’s harsher accusations); Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.8.1-2.8.5 (continued emotional pressure)
Mahābhārata: Śakuni-like rhetoric—professed concern masking provocation
Ayodhyākāṇḍa 2.9 (Kaikeyī’s agitation intensifies)
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Grieving
Soft mandra opening rising to tāra on ‘analen-eva’ to paint inner heat
It shows how claims of 'welfare' can be used to justify agitation; dharmically, intention (bhāva) must align with truth (satya), not merely emotional display.
Mantharā intensifies her warning by presenting herself as distressed and acting 'for Kaikeyī’s good' to gain trust.
The verse performs the appearance of concern; it primarily illustrates rhetorical strategy rather than a genuine virtue.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.