The Caitra Dvādaśī Observance and the Ritual Procedure for Worship of Vāmana
Pūrva Bhāga · Viṣṇu-aṅga-vinyāsa (iconographic/theological mapping of the deity’s limbs)
कण्ठं विश्वकृते पूज्य शिरो वै व्योमरूपिणे । बाहू विश्वजिते पूज्य स्वनाम्ना शङ्खचक्रकौ ॥ ४३.३ ॥
kaṇṭhaṃ viśvakṛte pūjya śiro vai vyomarūpiṇe | bāhū viśvajite pūjya svanāmnā śaṅkhacakrakau || 43.3 ||
kaNThaM vishvakRRite pUjya shiro vai vyomarUpiNe | bAhU vishvajite pUjya svanAmnA shaMkhachakrakau || 43.3 ||
Należy czcić gardło jako (formę zwaną) Wiśwakryt; głowę zaś należy czcić jako (formę) Wjomarupin. Ramiona należy czcić jako (formę) Wiśwadżit; a muszlę i dysk należy czcić ich własnymi imionami.
Varāha
Divine names are not mere labels; they are contemplative gateways to specific powers/realities of the same Supreme.
When reciting each epithet, briefly contemplate its meaning (creator, space-pervader, all-conqueror) while offering to the corresponding limb/region.
The epithets (Viśvakṛt, Vyomarūpin, Viśvajit) universalize the deity’s body: creation, space-pervasion, and conquest are installed into specific loci, turning the icon into a cosmological diagram.
Āyudha-vandana parallels yajña’s protective and ordering implements; śaṅkha-cakra function as dharma’s proclamation and cosmic order (ṛta) enforcement within the ritual body.
Names point to nirguṇa-backed functions: the One appears as maker of all (viśvakṛt), as space itself (vyoma-rūpin), and as transcendent victor (viśvajit), supporting contemplation of immanence + transcendence.
Continue aṅga-pūjā: worship throat as Viśvakṛt, head as Vyomarūpin, arms as Viśvajit; honor śaṅkha and cakra by their own names.
Accurate iconographic reverence and mantra-addressing completes the worship and yields fuller devotional fruit; omission/incorrectness reduces ritual integrity.
Implied: protection and completeness through honoring Viṣṇu’s forms and weapons.
Conch and discus (śaṅkha-cakra) are classic Viṣṇu/Kṛṣṇa emblems.
43.43.2 (preceding limb worship); 43.43.4 (post-worship ritual placement of kumbha)
It reflects a Purāṇic mode of theological iconography in which bodily features and emblems are correlated with named divine aspects, useful for reconstructing historical devotional and ritual vocabularies.
No geographic location is named in this verse; the content is primarily iconographic and theological rather than topographical.
The verse frames a disciplined practice of reverent attention—assigning respectful recognition to specific forms/epithets and emblems—presented as a structured contemplative or ritual approach rather than a social-legal injunction.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.