Sukta 3
य आ॑त्म॒दा ब॑ल॒दा यस्य॒ विश्व॑ उ॒पास॑ते प्र॒शिषं॒ यस्य॑ दे॒वाः । यो॒३स्येशे॑ द्वि॒पदो॒ यश्चतु॑ष्पद॒स्तस्य॑ दे॒वस्य॑ । क्रु॒द्धस्यै॒तदागो॒ य ए॒वं वि॒द्वांसं॑ ब्राह्म॒णं जि॒नाति॑ । उद् वे॑पय रोहित॒ प्र क्षि॑णीहि ब्रह्म॒ज्यस्य॒ प्रति॑ मुञ्च॒ पाशा॑न्
yá ātmadā́ baladā́ yásya víśva upā́sate praśíṣaṃ yásya devā́ḥ | yó ’syéśe dvipádo yáś cátuṣpadas tásya devásya | kruddhásyáitád ā́go yá eváṃ vidvā́ṃsaṃ brāhmaṇáṃ jinā́ti | úd vepaya rohita prá kṣiṇīhi brahmajyásya práti muñca pā́śān ||
He who bestoweth life, bestoweth strength—whose ordinance all serve, whose ordinance even the Gods obey; who is lord of the two-footed and the four-footed—of that God: this is the offence against the wrathful One, whoso, thus knowing, injureth a learned Brahman. Up—make him tremble, O Rohita; waste him away: in requital loose forth the nooses upon the Brahma-hurter.
On, który daje życie, daje siłę, którego rozporządzeniu wszyscy służą, którego rozporządzeniu nawet Bogowie się poddają; który jest panem dwunożnych i czworonożnych, tego Boga: to jest występek przeciwko Gniewnemu, kto tak wiedząc, krzywdzi uczonego Brahmana. Wstań, spraw, by drżał, o Rohita; wyniszcz go: w odwecie uwolnij pęta na krzywdziciela Brahmy.
The verse praises a sovereign power who gives life and strength, whose ordinance all obey—even the gods—who rules bipeds and quadrupeds. Harming a learned Brahman is named an offense against that wrathful deity; Rohita is commanded to terrify, waste, and bind the offender.
Authority is framed as the source-code of vitality (ātma/bala) and social order (praśiṣ). To injure the wise is to injure the very ‘operating system’ of life; therefore the psyche experiences backlash as fear and depletion until behavior is constrained.
Life and strength flourish under shared norms. When those who preserve knowledge are attacked, the same norms turn coercive: consequences bind the offender and protect the whole.
To invoke the supreme lord’s jurisdiction over life and strength to punish a brahma-injurer by wasting and binding.
यः । आत्म-दाः । बल-दाः । यस्य । विश्वे । उपासते । प्रशिषम् । यस्य । देवाः । यः । अस्य । ईशे । द्वि-पदः । यः । चतुः-पदः । तस्य । देवस्य । क्रुद्धस्य । एतत् । आगः । यः । एवम् । विद्वांसम् । ब्राह्मणम् । जिनाति । उत् । वेपय । रोहित । प्र । क्षिणीहि । ब्रह्म-ज्यस्य । प्रति । मुञ्च । पाशान्
Sāyaṇa emphasizes the deity’s sovereignty over prāṇa (self/breath) and bala (strength), and his universal ‘praśiṣ’ (command). The social-economic pair ‘dvipad/catuṣpad’ marks total dominion over people and cattle; hence brahma-injury is rebellion against cosmic kingship, punished by Rohita and pāśa.
Unknown (Anukramaṇī not supplied; Atharvanic legal-protective voice)
Juridical/punitive charms, protection of brahman and the social body (humans+cattle), refrained incantation technique.
Articulates sovereignty as the giver of life/strength; sacrilege becomes a cosmic crime, not merely personal wrongdoing.
Sovereign Lord of ordinance (implicit Āditya/Varuṇa-like); Rohita as executor
Establishes and enforces rule that even gods respect; guarantees vitality and strength; Rohita operationalizes punishment as heat and binding.
Indirect: restores social health by deterring violence against knowledge-bearers and stabilizing the household order.
Strong apotropaic protection over persons and cattle/wealth domain through threat of binding retribution.
Mixed/irregular; Atharvanic anuṣṭubh base with expanded pādas and refrain
Praise clause (relative pronouns) → identification ‘tasya devasya’ → fixed refrain of offense and punitive imperatives.
Refrain stabilizes performance; expansions accommodate legal-theological enumeration (life/strength/ordinance/domains).
Solemn, declarative; turns sharply into imperative coercion in the refrain.
Creates juridical authority: ‘whoever he is’ → ‘this is the crime’ → ‘execute sentence’.
Recite while enumerating the protected domain (household, cattle-pen) to align with ‘dvipad/catuṣpad’.
Touch the cord/noose to the threshold or cattle-stall post to signify jurisdiction.
At ‘ud vepaya’, shake the cord; at ‘pra kṣiṇīhi’, draw it taut; at ‘prati muñca’, fling/lay it toward the offender’s quarter.
Kauśika Sūtra: brahmajya-karman; pāśa-rite with reversal (prati) (edition-dependent numbering).
Brahman/Atharvan as household-protector, extending sacral protection over persons and cattle and redirecting punitive bonds.
Protective recitation to safeguard a household’s learned advisor/priest and its cattle/wealth from hostile acts; could be paired with boundary-marking (cord/line) around the house or cowshed.
At onset of threat, during disputes, or as periodic protective rite for household prosperity and safety.
Atharvanic specialist articulates the ‘ordinance’ and releases the punitive refrain.
Use as a protective boundary-setting prayer; avoid literal harm-wishing—focus on restraint and accountability.
praśiṣ (ordinance) as juridical force; pāśa (bond/noose); dvipad/catuṣpad (total social-wealth domain)
Here the operative ‘substance’ is command itself: praśiṣ as an invisible cord that organizes beings; pāśa is its visible coercive form.
Conceptual parallel: prāṇa/ojas as ‘life and strength’ protected by right conduct (ācāra).
Not clinical; parallels community safety and protection of educators/health workers; stress reduction through perceived justice/containment.
Brahma-hurter
Invoke sovereign ordinance to punish and bind the brahma-injurer; deter future harm by fear and depletion imagery.
Legal-theological proclamation (praśiṣ) + total-domain enumeration (dvipad/catuṣpad) + refrain imperatives to Rohita + symbolic binding (pāśa).
Attacks on learned Brahmans; destabilization of household-human-and-cattle order.
Cattle/wealth domain implied by catuṣpad; protection of the whole domestic economy.
Meditate on praśiṣ (inner discipline) as life-giving structure; let harmful impulses be ‘bound’ by vows.
Ajna (rule/command) with support from Manipura (strength)
Slow counted breathing (4-4-6) while mentally repeating praśiṣ—‘I align with order’.
A lattice of golden lines (ordinance) stabilizing the body and home; red light dissolves violent intent and tightens into a restraint cord.
Ethical sovereignty: calm authority rather than reactive anger.
Pair recitation with yama-niyama reflection (ahiṃsā, satya) to convert ‘wrath’ into disciplined protection.
Recitational; maintain clear relative-clause flow (yaḥ… yasya… yo…); then strike the refrain with firmer cadence.
Do not blur praśiṣaṃ; keep dvipado/ catuṣpadaḥ distinct; emphasize brahmajyasya in the binding command.
Majestic in the praise portion; sharper and more percussive in the refrain.
Refrain repetition is the ‘binding’ mechanism; keep intention as protection of dharma, not personal malice.
3 times
When community norms are threatened—harassment of teachers, clergy, counselors; protection of household wealth (people+cattle/resources).
Before mediation, at household protective rites, or when seeking moral courage to confront wrongdoing.
Strengthening of resolve, sense of lawful protection, deterrence framing.
Avoid naming individuals with hostile fixation; if used, pair with ethical commitments and real-world protective steps.
None; the verse is ‘political-theological’ rather than medical. Its operative material culture is the pāśa cord and the household/cattle-space it symbolically governs.
By pairing dvipads and catuṣpads, it maps sovereignty onto the full agrarian household economy; the Brahman’s protection is thereby tied to the protection of wealth and order.
The dvipád/cátuṣpad formula is old, but the explicit brahmajya curse-refrain and the legal ‘āgaḥ’ framing are Atharvanic specializations.
Gopatha’s concern with brahman as the regulator of prāṇa and social order resonates with ‘ātmadā/baladā’ and ‘praśiṣ’: the mantra enforces that order through sanctioned retaliation.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.