Nārāyaṇa as the Sacrificial Principle, Analysis of the Three Guṇas, and the Account of Delusion-Doctrines
महादेवो विरूपाक्षस्त्र्यम्बको नीललोहितः । सोऽपि रौद्रे स्थितः स्थाने बभूव परमेश्वरः ॥ ७०.६ ॥
mahādevo virūpākṣas tryambako nīlalohitaḥ | so 'pi raudre sthitaḥ sthāne babhūva parameśvaraḥ || 70.6 ||
Mahādeva—Virūpākṣa, Tryambaka dan Nīlalohita—sesungguhnya bersemayam dalam rupa Rudra, dan dalam kedudukan itu tampil sebagai Tuhan Yang Maha Tertinggi (Parameśvara).
Varāha (default, as speaker is not explicit in the excerpt)
It preserves a compact list of Śiva/Rudra epithets (Mahādeva, Virūpākṣa, Tryambaka, Nīlalohita), reflecting Purāṇic-era strategies of cataloguing divine names for liturgical memory and inter-sectarian textual continuity.
No geographic location is named in this verse; the focus is on divine epithets and the notion of a specific 'station/state' (sthāna) of Rudra.
Rather than a direct moral injunction, the verse conveys a philosophical instruction about recognizing multiple epithets/forms as referring to a single supreme principle (parameśvara), a common Purāṇic approach to theological unity.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.