Ramcharitmanas: Bala Kanda, Prakarana 21
Doha 207
सोपान-प्रवेश: ‘भक्ति का जन्म’ और ‘नाम-रूप’ में ब्रह्म की सहज सुलभता। बाललीला के माध्यम से जीव का चित्त कठोर तर्क-चतुराई छोड़कर प्रेम-सरलता (बालभाव) में उतरता है; यही मुक्तिसोपान का प्रथम स्थिर पायदान है—जहाँ निर्गुण-अगोचर प्रभु सगुण-शिशु बनकर साधक की दृष्टि को रस, विस्मय और शरणागति में शिक्षित करते हैं।
देहु भूप मन हरषित तजहु मोह अग्यान।धर्म सुजस प्रभु तुम्ह कौं इन्ह कहँ अति कल्यान।।207।।
dehu bhūpa mana haraṣita tajahu moha agyāna |dharma sujasa prabhu tumha kaũ inha kahã ati kalyāna ||207||
Wahai raja, berikanlah dengan hati yang gembira, dan buanglah khayalan serta kejahilan. Bagimu, tuanku, akan ada pahala dan nama yang mulaia, dan bagi kedua-dua budak ini kesejahteraan yang amat besar.
Speaker
Yajnavalkya (as framed in the Manas narration)
Listener
Bharadwaja
Dasya
The scene
The prasanga
A counsel-text moment in Bālakāṇḍa where royal conduct is evaluated through the lens of dharma: the speaker urges the king to act joyfully yet detached, emphasizing that true benefit comes from abandoning मोह and अज्ञान and embracing dharma and virtuous reputation.
The teaching
- Themes
- Dharma, Vivek (Discernment), Tyag of Moha, Rajdharma, Sadhu-Upadesh
For right living (Ramrajya ethics)
Rulership must be grounded in mental purity and dharmic intent; policy and gift-giving (or decisions) should arise from clarity, not attachment—yielding both लोक-कल्याण (public welfare) and सुजस (legitimate moral authority).
Nirguna and saguna
Ignorance and delusion are treated as veils that prevent recognition of the one Brahman; their removal enables devotion to the manifest Lord (Saguna) while implying the underlying unity (Nirguna) that illumines right action. The verse’s stress on inner purification makes Saguna worship the practical means to transcend the Nirguna-obscuring avidya.
Traditional Manas expositors read this as counsel aimed at stabilizing royal decision-making in śāstric virtues: the king is urged to act with a joyful, purified mind rather than from मोह and अज्ञान. ‘Dharma’ and ‘sujas’ are paired to show that ethical governance and lasting reputation arise from inner clarity. The address ‘prabhu’ simultaneously preserves courtly decorum and reminds that kingship is accountable to the Lord’s moral order.
Doha (13/11 mātrā pattern; two lines with caesura after the first pāda)
Anuprasa (soft alliteration in ‘moh agyān / dharm sujas’ through repeated consonant clusters); Yamaka-like semantic pairing (धर्म + सुजस as mutually reinforcing outcomes); Sambodhana (direct address: भूप, प्रभु)
Vishishtadvaita-leaning bhakti with jnana as ethical discernment (viveka) rather than dry abstraction
Bilawal (common bright framework for didactic doha recitation in Manas-path traditions)
देहु | भूप | मन | हरषित | तजहु | मोह | अग्यान |
धर्म | सु-जस | प्रभु | तुम्ह | कौं | इन्ह | कहँ | अति | कल्यान ||207||
- भूप
- राजाOrigin: Sanskrit
- हरषित
- प्रसन्न/हर्ष से युक्तOrigin: Sanskrit
- तजहु
- त्यागो/छोड़ोOrigin: Awadhi
- मोह
- आसक्ति/ममताOrigin: Sanskrit
- अग्यान
- अज्ञान/भ्रमOrigin: Sanskrit
- How does the use of Sanskritized Awadhi here elevate the 'Loka' (folk) to the 'Shastra' (scriptural)?
- The diction is predominantly accessible Awadhi, yet it is strategically anchored by Sanskritic ethical-theological keywords—dharma, ajñāna/agyān, kalyāṇa, and the honorific prabhu. This creates a register-shift: the listener hears familiar speech patterns (“dehu… tajahu…”) carrying concepts with śāstric density. The verse thus performs a cultural translation—placing normative political ethics (dharma, renown as moral legitimacy) into a vernacular imperative style. The result is that folk idiom becomes a vehicle for scriptural governance theory, without requiring technical Sanskrit exposition.
- What is the specific 'Siddhanta' (doctrine) Tulsidas establishes regarding the Name (Nama) vs Form (Rupa)?
- This verse does not explicitly stage the Name–Form doctrine; instead it supplies a prerequisite for it: the abandonment of delusion and ignorance as the condition for true devotion. Within Tulsidas’s broader siddhanta, clarity of mind enables the devotee (or ruler) to approach the Lord through accessible means—often the Name—without being trapped in egoic attachment. Therefore, the implied doctrine is functional rather than declarative: the efficacy of devotional practice (including the Name) depends on inner purification, which then allows the manifest Lord (Form) to be encountered as a conduit to the transcendent reality.
- How does this verse reflect the poet's 'Kavi-Manas' (the lake of the poet's mind) metaphor?
- The verse models the Manas metaphor by treating the mind as the decisive medium of moral and spiritual reflection: a ‘gladdened’ mind that has shed delusion becomes a clear surface capable of mirroring dharma. In the lake-imagery common to Manas exegesis, ignorance and attachment function like turbidity that prevents accurate reflection. By prescribing the removal of those obscurations, the verse aligns ethical governance with inner lucidity—precisely the condition under which the poet’s Manas (mind-lake) can hold and transmit the radiance of Rama’s order (Ramrajya) as both aesthetic truth and moral law.
FAQs
यह उपदेश राजा (भूप) को है कि वे पुत्र-प्रेषण/धर्म-कार्य में आसक्ति (मोह) और भ्रम (अज्ञान) छोड़कर प्रसन्न-चित्त से उचित निर्णय लें।
यह बताता है कि धर्मपालन से कीर्ति (सुजस) निर्मल होती है; वक्ता राजा के लिए कल्याण यही मानता है कि वे धर्मानुकूल आचरण करें, जिससे यश और पुण्य दोनों बढ़ें।
वक्ता (ऋषि/संत-स्वर) राजा के हित की बात करता है—कि यह निर्णय आपके लिए परम कल्याणकारी होगा; धर्म भी सुरक्षित रहेगा और लोक-प्रतिष्ठा भी।
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Ramcharitmanas in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Awadhi recitation where available, and more.
