Varaha Purana 22.2: Adhyaya 22, Shloka 2
Gaurī’s Rebirth, Umā’s Austerities, Rudra’s Test, and the Himalayan Wedding
Pūrva Bhāga · Mythic-Theological Narrative (Dakṣa-yajña episode)
चिन्तयामास दक्षस्य अनेनापकृतं पुरा । यज्ञो विध्वंसितो यस्मात् तस्माच्चान्यां तनूमहम् ॥ २२.२ ॥
cintayāmāsa dakṣasya anenāpakṛtaṃ purā | yajño vidhvaṃsito yasmāt tasmāc cānyāṃ tanūm aham || 22.2 ||
chintayAmAsa dakShasya anenApakRRitaM purA | yaj~no vidhvaMsito yasmAt tasmAchchAnyAM tanUmaham || 22.2 ||
तो मनात विचार करू लागला—“याने पूर्वी दक्षाचा अपकार केला; त्याच कारणाने यज्ञाचा विध्वंस झाला. म्हणून मी आता दुसरे रूप धारण करीन.”
Sandhi Notes
- अनेनापकृतम् = अनेन + अपकृतम्
- तस्माच्च = तस्मात् + च
- तनूमहम् = तनूम् + अहम्
Varāha
Observer-like; narratively reflective rather than emotionally foregrounded
How should one respond to a prior transgression that caused the ruin of Dakṣa’s sacrifice—by changing one’s form/approach to restore ritual order?
Accountability for past harm and the necessity of remedial transformation to restore dharma.
When one’s actions damage communal/religious order, adopt concrete corrective measures (apology, restitution, disciplined change of conduct) rather than defensiveness.
‘Assuming another form’ functions as a Purāṇic idiom for divine adaptability: the Lord reshapes manifestation to re-stabilize ṛta when ritual order collapses.
Yajña ‘destroyed’ (vidhvaṃsita) evokes the cosmic sacrifice motif; the divine response is re-manifestation to re-ground yajña in the world.
Saguna manifestation is purposive (līlā/anuśāsana): form is an upāya for loka-saṅgraha, not a limitation of the Absolute.
When a grave offense has disrupted yajña and social-ritual harmony, one should adopt a corrective course (including transformation/renunciation of former stance) aimed at restoration.
Corrective action leads toward re-establishing yajña and reducing the burden of the offense; neglect perpetuates adharma and ritual rupture.
Varāha Purāṇa 22.22 (Dakṣa-yajña narrative thread)
FAQs
It preserves a Purāṇic narrative motif linked to the Dakṣa-yajña cycle, illustrating how later Sanskrit compendia integrated ritual history, mythic causality, and moral discourse into a continuous textual tradition.
No geographic location is named in this verse; it focuses on a narrative recollection concerning Dakṣa’s sacrifice rather than sacred topography.
The verse frames ritual destruction as a consequence of prior wrongdoing (apakṛta), presenting a philosophical instruction about moral causality and accountability within social-ritual order.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
