Sukta 3
यो अ॑न्ना॒दो अन्न॑पतिर्ब॒भूव॒ ब्रह्म॑ण॒स्पति॑रु॒त यः । भू॒तो भ॑वि॒ष्यद् भुव॑नस्य॒ यस्पति॒स्तस्य॑ दे॒वस्य॑ । क्रु॒द्धस्यै॒तदागो॒ य ए॒वं वि॒द्वांसं॑ ब्राह्म॒णं जि॒नाति॑ । उद् वे॑पय रोहित॒ प्र क्षि॑णीहि ब्रह्म॒ज्यस्य॒ प्रति॑ मुञ्च॒ पाशा॑न्
yó annādó annápatir babhū́va bráhmaṇas pátir utá yáḥ | bhūtó bhaviṣyád bhúvanasya yás pátis tásya devásya | kruddhásyaitád ā́go yá eváṃ vidvā́ṃsaṃ brāhmaṇáṃ jinā́ti | úd vepaya rohita prá kṣiṇīhi brahmajyásya práti muñca pā́śān
He who became the Eater of food, the Lord of food; who is Lord of brahman also; who is master of what hath been and what shall be, the lord of the world of being—of that God. This is the offence against that wrathful God, whoso thus wrongs a knowing Brahmin. Make him quake, O Rohita; waste him away; against the Brahmin-hurter loose back the nooses.
ಯಾರು ಅನ್ನಭೋಕ್ತ (ಅನ್ನಾದ)ನಾಗಿ, ಅನ್ನದ ಸ್ವಾಮಿ (ಅನ್ನಪತಿ)ಯಾಗಿ ಆದನೋ; ಯಾರು ಬ್ರಹ್ಮಣಸ್ಪತಿ ಕೂಡ ಆಗಿರುವನೋ; ಯಾರು ಭೂತ-ಭವಿಷ್ಯಗಳ ಅಧಿಪತಿ, ಭವನ (ಲೋಕ)ದ ಸ್ವಾಮಿ ಆಗಿರುವನೋ—ಆ ದೇವನ ಕುರಿತು. ಕ್ರುದ್ಧನಾದ ಆ ದೇವನಿಗೆ ವಿರುದ್ಧವಾಗಿ ಇದು ಅಪರಾಧ—ಯಾರು ಹೀಗೆ ಜ್ಞಾನಿಯಾದ ಬ್ರಾಹ್ಮಣನನ್ನು ಹಿಂಸಿಸಿ/ಅಪಮಾನಿಸಿ ಜಯಿಸಲು ಯತ್ನಿಸುತ್ತಾನೋ. ಹೇ ರೋಹಿತ, ಅವನನ್ನು ನಡುಗಿಸು; ಅವನನ್ನು ಕ್ಷೀಣಗೊಳಿಸು; ಬ್ರಹ್ಮಹಂತನ ಮೇಲೆ ಪಾಶಗಳನ್ನು ಪ್ರತಿಯಾಗಿ ಬಿಡು (ಕಟ್ಟಿ ಬಿಗಿಸು).
The deity is praised as eater and lord of food, and as lord of brahman; master of what has been and what will be, lord of the world. Against that wrathful god it is an offence to wrong a knowing Brahmin; Rohita is commanded to make the offender tremble, waste away, and to reverse the nooses upon him.
Food (anna) is sovereignty over life; brahman is sovereignty over meaning and law. When one harms a knower, one attacks both sustenance and sacred intelligence; the consequence is depletion (kṣaya) and loss of support—social and existential.
Power over resources and power over knowledge are inseparable foundations of society. Violating the guardians of knowledge corrodes both prosperity and legitimacy, returning constraint upon the violator.
To invoke a sovereign deity (lord of food and brahman) to punish the Brahmin-injurer by fear, depletion, and fettering.
यः । अन्नादः । अन्नपतिः । बभूव । ब्रह्मणः-पतिः । उत । यः । भूतः । भविष्यत् । भुवनस्य । यः-पतिः । तस्य । देवस्य । क्रुद्धस्य । एतत् । आगः । यः । एवम् । विद्वांसम् । ब्राह्मणम् । जिनाति । उत् । वेपय । रोहित । प्र । क्षिणीहि । ब्रह्मज्यस्य । प्रति । मुञ्च । पाशान्
Sāyaṇa emphasizes the deity’s sovereignty over nourishment (anna) and over brahman (spell/holy speech), extending to temporal totality (past and future) and the whole bhuvana. The refrain defines the actionable guilt: injury to a learned Brahmin is an offense against this sovereign god, who therefore authorizes Rohita to punish by trembling, wasting, and binding.
Atharvanic/Angirasa attribution uncertain (anukramaṇī-dependent); mantra voice aligned with Atharvanic social protection
Protective theology linking prosperity (anna) and sacred authority (brahman) to justify punitive reversal against Brahmin-harmers.
By naming the deity as lord of both food and brahman, the charm asserts that attacking a Brahmin is an attack on the very pillars of life and order.
Brahmaṇaspati/Bṛhaspati-like sovereign (lord of brahman) with time-sovereignty; Rohita as punitive agent in refrain
Cosmic rulership over sustenance and sacred speech; governs time continuity; authorizes sanctions against violations of brahman.
Protects brahman and its carriers; ensures offenders lose strength/support and are bound by returned pāśas.
Mixed; refrain-driven; triṣṭubh-like cadence in praise portion
Praise pādas (lordship titles) + fixed refrain
Title-stacking (epithet lists) tends to compress/expand syllables; refrain standardizes delivery
Royal proclamation tone; then punitive command
Feels like reading a sovereign’s decree: authority first, enforcement second.
Recite while holding or displaying a cord/noose as the material correlate of pāśa.
Gesture ‘casting back’ (prati) toward the offender’s direction/name.
Conclude with a protective act for the Brahmin (touching head/heart; or enclosing with a cord), per prayoga.
Kauśika Sūtra: rites addressing brahmajyā/brahmabandhu-harm and counter-binding.
Atharvan priest as enforcer of sacral law; he operationalizes the mantra as a juridical ‘return’ of guilt and punishment.
Recite in the food-store area (granary/kitchen) as a reminder that prosperity depends on respecting sacred counsel; used when a household teacher is threatened or when slander disrupts harmony.
Before meals (anna context) or at dawn; also during dispute settlement.
Household priest/elder leads recitation; may accompany a vow of respectful speech and offerings of food to the learned.
KauśS: protective/abhicāra recitations safeguarding brahman and household prosperity; exact citation depends on edition
Ethical recitation before communal meals to reinforce respect for teachers and non-violent speech.
anna (food as prosperity/sovereignty token); brahman (spell-power); pāśa (fetters)
Food is the concrete sign of sovereignty and prosperity; the mantra implies that harming brahman jeopardizes one’s ‘anna’ (support), leading to kṣaya (wasting). Noose is the sanction mechanism.
Anna as ojas-support metaphor (indirect); the mantra’s aim is punitive/protective, not therapeutic.
Protection of intellectual/educational institutions; deterrence against abuse by invoking legitimacy and consequence.
brahmajya
To invoke sovereign authority over sustenance and brahman to punish and bind the Brahmin-injurer; induce trembling and wasting.
Royal-epithet legitimation + juridical accusation + reversal of pāśa; performative imperatives.
Coercion, exploitation, or violence against learned persons; disruption of counsel and ritual order
Food security and social legitimacy (implicitly safeguarded by protecting ‘annapati/brahmaṇaspati’)
Contemplate ‘anna’ and ‘brahman’ as two supports: nourish the body and nourish truth; align consumption with ethics.
Manipura (assimilation/anna) and Vishuddha (brahman/speech)
Moderate diaphragmatic breathing; on exhale, mentally release resentment; keep refrain as boundary affirmation.
A store of grain protected by a ring of light; harmful cords rebound and dissolve; the protected teacher seated at the center with calm authority.
Dignified resolve; ethical courage.
Before eating or speaking counsel, recall interdependence: prosperity requires respect for knowledge; practice dana (food-giving) and satya-vāk.
Proclaim epithets with steady rise; refrain with clipped force
Emphasize compounds: annā́do annápatir… brahmaṇáspatir… bhūtó bhaviṣyád…
Authoritative, ‘decree-like’; refrain slightly louder
Pairing with a small food offering to a learned person aligns the ‘anna’ theology with non-violent protection.
7 times
When prosperity and harmony are threatened by disrespect toward teachers/elders or by attacks on counsel and learning.
Before communal meals, before teaching, or when resolving a dispute involving slander/abuse.
Reinforces respect for knowledge; traditional aim: offender loses force and is restrained; protected person feels supported.
Avoid using to justify social oppression; keep focus on protecting the vulnerable and upholding truth.
Again, no herb; the ‘material’ is food (anna) as a political-theological symbol of control. The mantra weaponizes deprivation (kṣiṇīhi) as the inverse of anna-lordship.
It links Brahmin inviolability to cosmic sovereignty: the same power that controls food and time polices offenses against the learned Brahmin, reinforcing brahminical centrality.
The compact sovereignty-titles (annāda/annapati) and the explicit temporal totalization (bhūta/bhaviṣyat) are typical Atharvanic cataloguing. The refrain’s legal framing is more Atharvanic than RV hymnody.
Gopatha’s Atharvanic theology often equates brahman with effective speech and the Brahmin with its custodian; thus harming him disrupts order and warrants coercive restoration through mantra.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.