मन्थराप्रवेशः · Manthara Observes Ayodhya and Incites Kaikeyi
Spoken by Manthara to KaikeyiSetting: Ayodhyā (Kaikeyī’s quarters)
तव दुःखेन कैकेयि मम दुःखं महद्भवेत् ।
त्वद्वृद्धौ मम वृद्धिश्च भवेदत्र न संशयः ॥२२॥
tava duḥkhena kaikeyi mama duḥkhaṃ mahad bhavet |
tvadvṛddhau mama vṛddhiś ca bhaved atra na saṃśayaḥ ||22||
O Kaikeyī, dein Kummer würde zu meinem großen Kummer werden; und mit deinem Gedeihen würde auch meines wachsen—daran besteht kein Zweifel.
O Kaikeyi, your sorrow will augment my sorrow. Your prosperity would mean my prosperity. There is no doubt about this.
Claims of shared fate can be tools of influence; dharmic decisions require principles beyond personal alliances.
Encourages discrimination between genuine compassion and transactional empathy; useful for daily reflection on motives.
False identification (‘your rise is my rise’) reflects saṅga-based selfhood; Vedānta redirects identity from relational gain to ātma-svarūpa.
Chāndogya’s teaching that true fullness is not in external increase (vṛddhi) contrasts with the verse’s worldly ‘prosperity’ calculus.
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.7.21 (fear-sorrow preface); Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.7.23 (appeal to royal realism)
Mahābhārata: courtly persuasion where counselors bind patrons through shared fate rhetoric
Ayodhyākāṇḍa 2.8 (Mantharā’s strategy: first secure trust, then provoke action)
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Solemn
Even, narrative svara with gentle cadence to mimic ‘assurance’
It underlines the power of counsel rooted in claimed loyalty; dharma demands that advice be truthful and beneficial, not merely aligned with self-interest.
Mantharā asserts shared fate with Kaikeyī to strengthen her influence and make her warning persuasive.
Solidarity is invoked as a virtue, though the broader episode questions the sincerity and moral direction of that solidarity.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.