क्रोधागारप्रवेशः · Entry into the Chamber of Wrath
Kaikeyī’s Protest
Spoken by King DaśarathaSetting: Ayodhyā palace (inner apartments)
अहं चैव मदीयाश्च सर्वे तव वशानुगाः ।
न ते किञ्चिदभिप्रायं व्याहन्तुमहमुत्सहे ॥३४॥
ahaṃ caiva madīyāś ca sarve tava vaśānugāḥ |
na te kiñcid abhiprāyaṃ vyāhantum aham utsahe ||34||
Ich und alle, die zu mir gehören, sind deinem Willen gehorsam; ich würde nicht einmal wagen, irgendeinen Teil deiner Absicht zu vereiteln.
My kins and I are under your control. I will make no effort to go even a little againstyour wishes.
Authority without discernment becomes abdication; dharma requires the ruler to remain anchored in justice, not in private compulsion.
Invites reflection on right surrender: surrender to dharma/Īśvara vs surrender to fear or attachment.
Surrender here is not īśvara-prapatti but personal subjugation; Vedānta distinguishes liberating surrender to the Self/Īśvara from binding surrender to desire and fear.
Contrast with the Upaniṣadic ideal of ātma-vaśitva (mastery of self) rather than being mastered by another+cs will.
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.10.35 (oath and life-offer); Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.12-2.13 (Kaikeyī leverages the boons)
Mahābhārata: warnings about a king ruled by private attachment rather than dharma (rājadharma discourses)
Ayodhyākāṇḍa: the political catastrophe that follows from Daśaratha+cs capitulation
Anuṣǖdup (anuṣǖdubh)
Solemn
Low, steady register; weighty pauses
Dharma values loyalty, but not at the cost of righteousness; surrendering judgment entirely to another’s desire risks abandoning the king’s duty to truth and justice.
Daśaratha tries to reassure Kaikeyī by declaring that he and his household will follow her wishes without resistance.
Loyalty and pliancy—presented in a way that foreshadows ethical peril when loyalty becomes uncritical.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.