HomeVaraha PuranaAdhyaya 24Shloka 21
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Varaha Purana 24.21: Adhyaya 24, Shloka 21

The Birth of the Nāgas, Brahmā’s Curse, and the Pañcamī Observance

ब्रह्मोवाच । यदि नाम मया सृष्टा भवन्तः कुटिलाशयाः । ततः किं मनुजान् नित्यं भक्षयध्वं गतव्यथाः ॥ २४.२१ ॥

Sanskrit recitationVaraha Purana 24.21

brahmovāca | yadi nāma mayā sṛṣṭā bhavantaḥ kuṭilāśayāḥ | tataḥ kiṃ manujān nityaṃ bhakṣayadhvaṃ gatavyathāḥ || 24.21 ||

బ్రహ్ముడు పలికెను—నిజంగా నేను మిమ్మల్ని కూటిల్యాశయులతో సృష్టించాననుకో, దానివల్ల ఏమి? అయితే మీరు ఎందుకు నిత్యం మనుష్యులను భక్షిస్తారు, బాధా-పరిణామభయములేనివారిలా?

brahmā-uvācaBrahmā said
brahmā-uvāca:
yadiif
yadi:
nāmaindeed/for argument’s sake
nāma:
mayāby me
mayā:
sṛṣṭāḥcreated
sṛṣṭāḥ:
bhavantaḥyou (plural)
bhavantaḥ:
kuṭila-āśayāḥhaving crooked intentions/devious dispositions
kuṭila-āśayāḥ:
tataḥthen/from that
tataḥ:
kimwhat?
kim:
manujānhuman beings
manujān:
nityamalways/constantly
nityam:
bhakṣayadhvamyou devour (2nd pl. middle/imperative-like usage)
bhakṣayadhvam:
gata-vyathāḥhaving gone beyond pain/distress
gata-vyathāḥ:
(implied) kutaḥ/kimarthamwhy/for what reason (sense in context).
(implied) kutaḥ/kimartham:

Brahmā

Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":false}

Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":true,"speaker_role":"instructor","key_question":"If your origin is attributed to my creation, what justification does that give for continually devouring humans without fear of consequence?"}

Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false}

Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"instruction_summary":"Creation or innate disposition is not a moral license; predation on humans is blameworthy and invites accountability.","karmic_consequence":"Unchecked हिंसा (harm) accrues demerit and leads to suffering/retaliation and punitive outcomes; restraint aligns with order and reduces karmic burden."}

Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false}

Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":false}

Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"ethics of agency","core_concept":"Moral responsibility is not nullified by origin, nature, or alleged predestination; intentional harm remains culpable.","practical_application":"Do not excuse wrongdoing as ‘inborn’ or ‘created so’; adopt restraint and accountability in social conduct."}

Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Cosmology","Moral Accountability"]

Primary Rasa: raudra

Secondary Rasa: bibhatsa

Type: cosmic court/dialogue setting

Related Themes: Varaha Purana 24.24.22-25 (boundary-setting compact and relocation)

Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"Brahmā, seated in a cosmic assembly, admonishes the Nāgas for devouring humans, his hand raised in questioning reproach while the Nāgas appear defensive or sullen.","item_prompts":["Brahmā with four faces and kamaṇḍalu","assembly hall/cosmic lotus-seat","Nāgas with hoods folded in petition/defiance","gesture of admonition (tarjanī or open palm)","humans in the background as threatened victims"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural style: Brahmā in warm ochres and greens, stylized Nāga hoods, expressive eyes, formal court composition, minimal depth, ornate borders.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore style: central Brahmā with gold-leaf aureole, embossed ornaments, Nāgas flanking in symmetrical layout, rich reds/greens, temple-like framing.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore style: delicate linework, subdued jewel tones, Brahmā’s calm but stern expression, Nāgas rendered with refined scales, soft shading.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari style: lyrical court scene with pale background, slender figures, Nāga hoods as decorative arcs, emphasis on narrative gesture and facial emotion."}

Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"admonitory and judicial","suggested_raga":"Bhairav","pace":"medium-slow","voice_tone":"firm, interrogative, morally weighty"}

C
Classical Literature
P
Purāṇic Dialogue
D
Dharma and Ethics
S
Sanskrit Philology

FAQs

It reflects a common Purāṇic literary strategy: a creator-figure (here, Brahmā) addresses destructive beings to frame ethical responsibility within a cosmological narrative, emphasizing that origin does not justify ongoing harm.

No geographic location is named in this verse; it is a moral-dialogic statement rather than a passage of sacred geography.

The verse questions the justification of continual violence against humans and implies moral accountability: even if one’s nature or origin is flawed, that does not legitimize persistent harmful action.

Ask anything about this verse

Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.

Not sure where to start?

A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.

Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app

Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.

Continue reading in the Vedapath app

Open in App