Expiation for Chewing the Tooth-stick
Dantakāṣṭha
धरण्युवाच ॥ सर्वकालकृतं कर्म क्लेशेन महताऽनघ ॥ कथमेकापराधेन सर्वमेव प्रणश्यति ॥
dharaṇyuvāca || sarvakālakṛtaṃ karma kleśena mahatā ’nagha || katham ekāparādhena sarvam eva praṇaśyati ||
ధరణి పలికింది—ఓ నిర్దోషుడా! మహా కష్టంతో దీర్ఘకాలంలో కూడబెట్టిన కర్మ, ఒక్క అపరాధంతో ఎలా అంతటా నశిస్తుంది?
Pṛthivī (Dharā)
Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":true,"earth_interaction":"Direct questioning: Bhūdevī challenges the moral logic of karmic destruction by a single act/offense, seeking doctrinal coherence from the Lord."}
Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":true,"speaker_role":"questioner","bhu_devi_state":"Curious, ethically concerned, slightly perplexed; protective of moral proportionality and the lived reality of effortful karma accumulation.","key_question":"How can all karma accumulated over a long time and with great hardship be destroyed by a single offense (or single act)?"}
Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false}
Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"topic":"prayaschitta","instruction_summary":"Raises a dharma-śāstric problem of proportionality: whether a single act/offense can nullify extensive accumulated karma—prompting clarification of prāyaścitta and karmic mechanics.","karmic_consequence":"If clarified as true, it implies swift karmic reversal (kṣaya or viparyaya) through a decisive act; if misunderstood, it risks moral laxity—hence the need for precise doctrine."}
Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false}
Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":true,"symbolic_interpretation":"Earth’s question dramatizes the interface of karma (accumulated causality) and grace/authority (īśvara-śakti). Varāha, the Earth-lifter, is also the ‘burden-lifter’ of karmic weight—yet the mechanism must be ethically intelligible.","yajna_varaha_imagery":"Implicit: ‘karmic accumulation’ as burden (bhāra) on Earth; Varāha’s avatāra archetype of lifting burdens mirrors the possibility of lifting karmic load through a single decisive rite/turning.","vedantic_connection":"Touches the debate between karma’s inexorability and īśvara-prasāda/bhakti: whether a single act (especially God-oriented) can burn seeds (bīja) of karma; anticipates distinctions like prārabdha vs sañcita in later Vedāntic framing (not explicit here)."}
Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"moral reasoning within bhakti-dharma","core_concept":"Dharma requires intelligibility: claims about instant karmic destruction must be reconciled with effort, justice, and the structure of karma.","practical_application":"Do not treat expiation or devotion as a license for carelessness; seek qualified explanation of prāyaścitta, intention (bhāva), and the conditions under which karma is mitigated."}
Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Ritual Purity","Dharma-shāstra Discourse"]
Primary Rasa: shanta
Secondary Rasa: vicitra (inquisitive/adbhuta)
Type: Dharma-śāstra discourse within Purāṇic dialogue
Related Themes: 131.1.0 (the claim that ‘by that single act a former deed is destroyed’); 131.2.0 (Earth asks for devotees’ welfare)
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"Bhūdevī, earnest and questioning, addresses the Lord: her hands raised in inquiry, brows slightly knit—asking how one act can erase long-earned karma.","item_prompts":["Bhūdevī in questioning posture (vitarka/saṃśaya gesture)","the Lord seated calmly, listening","a symbolic ‘heap’ or ‘scroll’ representing accumulated karma","subtle balance scales motif to suggest proportionality/justice","attentive devotees in background"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural: expressive eyes and hand-gestures for debate; Bhūdevī foregrounded; the Lord serene; stylized symbols (scales/heap) integrated into border motifs.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore: gold-backed divine court; Bhūdevī’s questioning gesture emphasized with ornate bangles; symbolic karma-scroll at her feet; rich embossing.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore: nuanced facial emotion—concern without agitation; soft interior setting; fine linework for gestures.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari: intimate conversational scene with lyrical minimalism; symbolic pile of deeds as small icon; gentle landscape or pavilion."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"Inquisitive, serious, dialectical","suggested_raga":"Kedar or Bhairav","pace":"Medium-slow, with a rhetorical lift on ‘कथम्’ and a firm cadence at ‘प्रणश्यति’","voice_tone":"Clear, questioning, respectful but intellectually insistent"}
It reflects a Purāṇic-legal style of inquiry into moral causality, aligning narrative dialogue with dharmaśāstric concerns about offense (aparādha) and the fragility of merit.
No specific geographic site is named in this verse; it is framed as a doctrinal question within a dialogue between Earth (Pṛthivī) and Varāha.
The verse foregrounds accountability by asking how a single transgression can negate long-accrued merit, prompting a discussion of conduct and expiation.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.