सीतानिवर्तनप्रयत्नः · Rama’s Attempt to Dissuade Sita from Forest Exile
Spoken by Rama to SitaSetting: Ayodhya (decision counsel)Places named: vana, kāntāraPre-exile persuasion
सीते विमुच्यतामेषा वनवासकृता मतिः ।
बहुदोषं हि कान्तारं वनमित्यभिधीयते ॥५॥
sīte vimucyatām eṣā vanavāsakṛtā matiḥ |
bahudoṣaṃ hi kāntāraṃ vanam ity abhidhīyate ||5||
Ó Sītā, abandona esta decisão de viver na floresta. Pois o ermo é chamado ‘floresta’ justamente por estar repleto de muitos perigos e dificuldades.
Give up the desire to live in the forest, O Sita! Living in the dreary jungle, it is said, has many hardships.
Not every ‘resolve’ is dharma; dharma includes sober appraisal of doṣas and consequences.
Before taking vows, examine doṣa and śakti (capacity); renunciation includes relinquishing impulsive saṅkalpa.
Renouncing a mistaken identification (‘I must go’) parallels dropping saṅkalpa born of emotion rather than discernment.
Īśa’s ‘tena tyaktena’ (renunciation with understanding) faintly echoes in the call to relinquish a resolve—though here for protection, not world-negation.
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.28.24-26 (continuation of dissuasion)
Rāmacaritamānasa Ayodhyākāṇḍa: Sītā’s insistence and Rāma’s concern (thematic parallel, not verbatim)
Ayodhyākāṇḍa: ‘vana-doṣa’ motif repeated in multiple counsel passages
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Commanding
Heavy mandra on ‘bahudoṣam’ and ‘kāntāram’
Dharma is aligned with discernment (viveka): one should not romanticize hardship when it conflicts with safety, responsibility, and realistic assessment.
Rāma directly urges Sītā to relinquish her wish to live in the forest, characterizing the wilderness as inherently perilous.
Practical wisdom and restraint—Rāma prioritizes careful judgment over emotional impulse.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.