A Sūtra-like Manual of Expiations for Ritual Transgressions
Uttara Bhāga · Varāha’s explanatory narrative: ignorance of practitioners and difficult actions
अद्यापि ते न जानन्ति ह्यनघे संहितव्रताः ॥ कृत्वा सुदुष्करं कर्म सर्वभूतपतिं हरिम् ॥
adyāpi te na jānanti hy anaghe saṃhitavratāḥ || kṛtvā suduṣkaraṃ karma sarvabhūtapatiṃ harim ||
adyApi te na jAnanti hyanaghe saMshitavratAH || kRRitvA suduShkaraM karma sarvabhUtapatiM harim
Wahai yang tidak bercela, hingga kini para pemegang nazar yang terkawal masih belum memahami—sesudah melakukan perbuatan yang amat sukar—tentang Hari, Tuhan segala makhluk.
Varāha
Curious; receptive to a critique of ascetic self-confidence and incomplete understanding.
Why do even disciplined vow-keepers fail to understand Hari, the Lord of all beings, even after undertaking extremely difficult acts?
Austerity and ‘saṃhita-vrata’ discipline alone do not guarantee true knowledge of Hari; divine reality exceeds mere human effort.
Cultivate humility and devotion alongside discipline; interpret ‘difficult acts’ as insufficient without right understanding and grace-oriented orientation.
Continues didactic address to Bhū-devī (‘anaghe’), framing a theological-ethical point about misunderstanding Hari despite severe austerity/effort.
Varāha Purāṇa 136 (didactic sequence on sin, agency, and divine comprehension)
It exemplifies Purāṇic pedagogy: disciplined practitioners are depicted as still lacking insight, underscoring the text’s role as an explanatory authority within its narrative world.
No geographic location is mentioned in this verse.
Discipline alone is presented as insufficient without understanding; ethical and spiritual action requires discernment (jñāna) in addition to practice (vrata/karma).
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.