Valmiki Ramayana 2.8.33: Ayodhya Kanda, Sarga 8, Shloka 33
मन्थराकैकेयीसंवादः · Mantharā’s Counsel to Kaikeyī
Ayodhyā’s Succession Alarm
Spoken by Manthara to KaikeyiSetting: Ayodhyā (royal residence)Places named: राजगृह (Rājagṛha), वन (forest)Proposed departure: palace/city to forest exile
तस्माद्राजगृहादेव वनं गच्छतु ते सुतः ।
एतद्धि रोचते मह्यं भृशं चापि हितं तव ॥३३॥
tasmād rājagṛhād eva vanaṃ gacchatu te sutaḥ |
etad dhi rocate mahyaṃ bhṛśaṃ cāpi hitaṃ tava ||33||
Oleh itu, dari Rājagṛha ini juga, biarlah puteramu pergi terus ke rimba. Inilah yang berkenan padaku, dan sesungguhnya amat bermanfaat bagimu juga.
Sandhi Notes
- tasmāt + rājagṛhāt + eva → tasmādrājagṛhādeva
- etat + hi → etaddhi
- ca + api → cāpi
Therefore let your son go to the forest straight from his uncle's palace only. That alone will please me. For you also this is highly beneficial.
The teaching
When power speaks in the language of ‘your benefit,’ discern motive; dharma requires clarity beyond coercive counsel.
Duties in tension
- King’s duty to protect heir and uphold justice vs obligation to honor boons/promises
- Queen’s maternal duty vs manipulation for power
- Prince’s duty to obey father vs right to rightful coronation
- Ethical theme
- Rājadharma (promise, succession, exile)
- How it resolves
- Edict/command leading to exile
For your practice
Invites reflection on accepting reversals without hatred (as Rāma later models) and on ethical speech in authority.
Mood and themes
- Rasa
- Raudra (fury), with Bhayanaka (fear)
- Mood
- Imperious, unyielding, politically-charged
Themes
- Dharma
- Ethics
- Exile
- Political-strategy
- Manipulation
The sudden command to leave ‘from the very royal house’ mirrors the jolt from comfort to vairāgya; externally imposed loss can become an inner path when met with equanimity (as Rāma later embodies).
Echo of the movement from gṛhastha security to forest ideal (vānaprastha/saṃnyāsa archetype), though here coerced—highlighting the tension between outer āśrama and inner readiness.
- Kaikeyi and Dasharatha
- Queen pressuring king to exile heir (coercive)
- Dasharatha and Rama
- Father_sending_son_to_forest (forced) (painful)
- Kaikeyi and Rama
- Banishment demand (hostile)
- Kaikeyi and Bharata
- Mother_advancing_son’s_claim (protective-possessive)
Mahābhārata: exile decrees issued from court (Pāṇḍava vanavāsa) as political turning points; Rāmacaritamānasa: Kaikeyī’s demand that Rāma go to the forest immediately (Ayodhyākāṇḍa)
Royal edict style (ājñā) and nīti rhetoric: ‘this is good for you’ as coercive framing
Ayodhyākāṇḍa: the two boons episode and immediate preparation for vanavāsa (adjacent narrative units)
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Commanding
Ṛṣabha
FAQs
It shows how counsel can be presented as ‘beneficial’ while being ethically inverted; dharma requires advice grounded in truth and welfare (hita) for all, not self-serving intrigue.
Mantharā proposes a drastic ‘solution’—sending Bharata to the forest—framing it as protection, while actually steering Kaikeyī toward extreme measures and factional outcomes.
The implied virtue is responsible counsel (mantra) aligned with satya; the verse demonstrates its counterfeit—strategic persuasion masked as concern.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Valmiki Ramayana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
