Atharva Veda 4.17.3: Kanda 4, Anuvaka 2, Sukta 17, Mantra 3
Sukta 17
या श॒शाप॒ शप॑नेन॒ याघं मूर॑माद॒धे। या रस॑स्य॒ हर॑णाय जा॒तमा॑रे॒भे तो॒कम॑त्तु॒ सा
yā́ śaśā́pa śápanena yā́ghaṃ mū́ram ādadhe | yā́ rásasya hárāṇāya jātámārebhe tókám attú sā́
She who hath cursed with cursing, who hath laid on evil and benumbing stupor; she who, to steal the vital sap, assaileth the child among the newly-born—let that woman be devoured (by her own bane).
La que maldijo con maldición, la que impuso el mal y el estupor entumecedor; la que, para robar la savia vital (rasa), acomete al niño entre los recién nacidos: que esa mujer sea devorada (por su propio maleficio).
The meaning
What it says
Identifies a hostile female agent who curses, imposes evil and stupor, and attacks a newborn to steal vitality; the charm commands that she be devoured by her own bane (recoil of harm).
The inner meaning
Names the pattern of predation—fear, envy, intrusive negativity—that targets the most vulnerable part of the self (the ‘newborn’); by naming it, the psyche reverses helplessness into boundary and protection.
The truth in it
Harm that feeds on others’ life-force is self-consuming when exposed; protective speech functions as a moral-energetic boomerang that returns aggression to its source.
What it is for
- Kind of hymn
- Rakṣā / Abhicārika-counter (counter-sorcery; protection of infants)
Its aim
To identify and reverse hostile cursing and vitality-theft aimed at newborns/children, causing the affliction to recoil upon its sender.
Word by Word
Pada patha
या । श॒शाप॒ । शप॑नेन । याघ॑म् । मूर॑म् । आ॒द॒धे । या । रस॑स्य । हर॑णाय । जा॒तमा॑रे॒भे । तो॒कम् । अ॒त्तु॒ । सा ।
- या
- she whoshe who; whichever (female agent: witch/curse-person, or personified affliction)Pronounस्त्रीलिङ्गे प्रथमा एकवचनम्Role KartāRoot यद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
- शशाप
- cursedhas cursed (performed a malediction as an act)Verbलिट् (परोक्सभूत), प्रथमपुरुष, एकवचनम्, परस्मैपदम्Role KriyāRoot √शप् (शपते/शप्)
- शपनेन
- with a curse / by cursingwith cursing; by an imprecation (instrument of hostile speech)Nounनपुंसकलिङ्गे तृतीया एकवचनम्Role KaraṇaRoot शपन (प्रातिपदिक; √शप्-न्युट्/करणार्थक)
- या
- she whoPronounस्त्रीलिङ्गे प्रथमा एकवचनम्Role KartāRoot यद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
- अघम्
- evil, sin, harmNounनपुंसकलिङ्गे द्वितीया एकवचनम्Role KarmaRoot अघ (प्रातिपदिक)
- मूरम्
- a harmful affliction/poisonous evil (mūra)stupor/delusion; a benumbing affliction (often read as a bewitching torpor)Nounपुंलिङ्गे द्वितीया एकवचनम्Role KarmaRoot मूर (प्रातिपदिक; AV-विशेषः—हानिकारक/दोष-रूपः)
- आदधे
- placed on, imposedhas placed/laid upon (deposited the affliction onto the victim)Verbलिट् (परोक्सभूत), प्रथमपुरुष, एकवचनम्, आत्मनेपदम्Role KriyāRoot √धा (आ-√धा)
- या
- she whoPronounस्त्रीलिङ्गे प्रथमा एकवचनम्Role KartāRoot यद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
- रसस्य
- of sap/essenceof sap/essence; of vital juice (life-fluid, strength, fertility)Nounपुंलिङ्गे षष्ठी एकवचनम्Role SambandhaRoot रस (प्रातिपदिक)
- हरणाय
- for taking away, for stealingNounनपुंसकलिङ्गे चतुर्थी एकवचनम्Role SampradānaRoot हरण (प्रातिपदिक; √हृ-ल्युट्)
- जातम्
- born, producedAdjective/Participleनपुंसकलिङ्गे द्वितीया एकवचनम् (to agree with implied object) / or प्रथमा एकवचनम् in appositionRole KarmaRoot जात (कृदन्त; √जन्-क्त)
- आरेभे
- undertook, set aboutVerbलिट् (परोक्सभूत), प्रथमपुरुष, एकवचनम्, आत्मनेपदम्Role KriyāRoot √रभ् (आ-√रभ्) / √रभ् (आरेभे)
- तोकम्
- offspring, childNounनपुंसकलिङ्गे द्वितीया एकवचनम्Role KarmaRoot तोक (प्रातिपदिक)
- अत्तु
- let (it/her) eat/devourmay (it) eat/devour (imprecatory reversal: let the evil recoil upon the sender)Verbलोट् (आज्ञार्थ), प्रथमपुरुष, एकवचनम्, परस्मैपदम्Role KriyāRoot √अद् (अत्ति)
- सा
- she (that one)she (that one; the curser/agent is targeted for recoil)Pronounस्त्रीलिङ्गे प्रथमा एकवचनम्Role KartāRoot तद् (सर्वनाम-प्रातिपदिक)
Sandhi Notes
- या | शशाप | शपनेन | या | अघम् | मूरम् | आदधे | या | रसस्य | हरणाय | जातम् | आरेभे | तोकम् | अत्तु | सा । Sandhi:
- (1) याघं → या + अघम् (आ-आगम/सवर्णदीर्घः)
- (2) मूरमादधे → मूरम् + आदधे (म् + आ → माद-)
- (3) रसस्य हरणाय (no obligatory sandhi; pada boundary kept)
- (4) जातमा॑रेभे → जातम् + आरेभे (म् + आ → मा-)
- (5) तो॒कम॑त्तु → तोकम् + अत्तु (म् + अ → मअत्तु, written mattu)
Seer, deity and metre
- Rishi
- Atharvanic seer(s) of protective/counter-sorcery hymns
- Devata
- Counter-sorcery force (often framed as Oṣadhi-power acting against the curser); implicitly the protective oṣadhis
- Chandas
- Anuṣṭubh
- Rasa
- Raudra and Bhayankara
Sāyaṇa interprets the verse as a recoil-formula: the hostile female agent (often a witch-like figure or personified curse) who imposes mūra (stupefaction) and drains rasa (vital essence) from infants is named so that the harm may return upon her. The infant (toka) indicates a domestic crisis-point—birth and early life—where Atharvanic protection is ritually urgent.
Atharvanic seer(s) of protective/counter-sorcery hymns (collective)
Rakṣā for infants, counter-abhicāra, identifying and reversing śapatha/evil eye
Shows the Atharvanic readiness to confront social-magical aggression directly, especially around birth—where liminality invites both care and fear.
Counter-sorcery recoil-force (protective oṣadhi/vāc acting as adversarial reversal)
Restores moral symmetry: hostile speech and vitality-theft are turned back, safeguarding generational continuity (tokam).
Protects infant vitality (‘rasa’), counters stupor/benumbing influences, stabilizes the household’s sense of safety.
Strong apotropaic recoil; boundary-setting against witchcraft/evil eye narratives.
4×8; direct relative clauses (yā…yā…) culminating in imperative/jussive
Legalistic identification formula: enumerate the offender’s acts, then pronounce reversal—typical of AV counter-charm rhetoric
Accusatory, tightening rhythm; the final command lands like a verdict
Creates protective resolve; helps caregivers feel agency and boundaries around the newborn.
The priest prepares an apotropaic herb application (Apāmārga brushing or a small herb-bundle).
The child is touched or circled (pary-ācar-) with the herb while reciting the identification of the curser and the affliction (mūra, rasa-haraṇa).
A final expulsion gesture is made outward (casting away, spitting, or throwing a fragment to a liminal place), synchronizing with the recoil wish ‘let her be devoured.’
Kauśika Sūtra: infant-protection and counter-sorcery applications using oṣadhis (including Apāmārga) with recoil-mantras from AVŚ 4.17.
Atharvan as protector of the household’s reproductive continuity: he diagnoses bewitchment, applies herbs, and performs verbal reversal to safeguard the toka.
Recite near cradle/threshold; trace a protective boundary; optionally touch child’s crown/forehead with herb bundle (gentle) and symbolically ‘send back’ harm outward.
First nights after birth; during crying/weakness episodes; after visits by strangers if evil-eye is feared.
Householder/elder woman or Atharvanic practitioner; emphasis on immediate domestic protection.
KauśS: Infant/child rakṣā rites and counter-evil-eye procedures are frequently paired with herb/amulet actions (exact mapping for 4.17.3 depends on recension indices).
Use as a protective prayer while ensuring neonatal warmth, feeding, hygiene, and medical checks.
Apāmārga and/or oṣadhi-bundle (contextual from 4.17; used as expellent); speech-act of imprecation reversal (verbal counter-weapon)
Implied household rakṣā: herb-bundle/mani often used in infant protection rites (not explicit in verse).
The key ‘substance’ here is rasa (vital sap): the charm protects the infant’s essence by denying the predator any nourishment and returning harm to its origin.
Infant affliction framed as curse/evil eye/vitality-theft; stupor/benumbing condition (mūra)
Diagnostic naming + recoil imprecation; socially and psychologically neutralizes fear of hidden attacker, ‘sealing’ the infant’s vitality
‘Rasa-haraṇa’ aligns with depletion/ojokṣaya imagery in later Ayurveda; protective regimen for neonate (rakṣoghna) resonates with postpartum care traditions.
Caregiver anxiety management and protective ritual framing around neonatal vulnerability; not a substitute for pediatric evaluation.
Hostile agent (explicit) and the affliction itself
Identify hostile curser and force the affliction to recoil upon its sender; protect newborn/child from vitality theft.
Recoil-imprecation (prati-abhicāra); juridical enumeration of offenses; may be paired with herb/amulet application from the hymn context.
Curse, evil eye, neonatal wasting/weakness, stupor-inducing influence
offspring continuity (tokam)
- शप्/शपन (śap/śapana)
- Toxic speech, coercive narratives, binding social hostility
- अघ (agha)
- Undifferentiated negativity/contagion that spreads if unnamed
- मूर (mūra)
- Psychic paralysis; dissociation; loss of clarity in crisis
- रस (rasa)
- Life-force, immunity, nourishment, emotional warmth
- जातमारेभे (jātam-ārebhe)
- Attack on beginnings—infancy, new projects, tender states
- तोकम् (tokam)
- Continuity of life; the fragile future that must be guarded
- अत्तु (attu)
- Reversal: the harm consumes itself; recoil principle
Boundary practice: recognize intrusive negativity and return it without internalizing.
muladhara
brisk_energetic exhale-focused breathing (without strain) to ‘send back’ the harm; then settle into slow breathing
A dark thread reaching for the infant’s light is cut; the thread recoils back into shadow and dissolves.
Alert protection, grounded vigilance
Use only when the mind is steady; end with a soothing lullaby-like silence to restore śānta for the child.
Keep the repeated yā…yā… clauses clearly segmented; final ‘attu sā’ delivered decisively (without shouting).
Stress semantic pivots: śaśāpa/śapanena, mūram ādadhe, rasasya haraṇāya, attu.
Low, firm, protective; end with a brief pause after attu.
As a counter-abhicāra verse, it is traditionally ‘projective’; follow with a calming verse (e.g., 4.17.2) to re-stabilize the space.
3 times
Newborn protection, fear of evil eye, family conflict/hostility around birth, unexplained infant lethargy (alongside medical evaluation).
At night near the cradle, before visitors arrive, or after an unsettling encounter.
Strengthened caregiver confidence and boundary sense; traditional protective framing for the infant’s vitality.
Do not accuse specific individuals; avoid escalating social paranoia; seek pediatric care for any concerning symptoms.
The herb (Apāmārga/oṣadhi-bundle) supplies the physical expellent, while the mantra supplies forensic identification and reversal. Together they enact a two-layer technology: material cleansing plus juridical naming of the offender/act.
The verse encodes domestic vulnerability (infant mortality, postpartum danger) and projects threat onto a stigmatized hostile ‘she.’ It reflects mechanisms of social boundary-making—locating misfortune in an externalized agent—while empowering priestly intervention as household security.
The concrete domestic focus (newborn/child, vitality theft) and the explicit counter-imprecation (‘let her be devoured’) are more typical of Atharvanic pragmatic diction than RV’s predominantly laudatory style.
Gopatha’s Atharvanic logic supports recoil by correct designation: naming the act (curse, mūra, rasa-haraṇa) and agent makes them ritually graspable, enabling transfer/return of harm through mantra-backed action.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Atharva Veda in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
