Sukta 49
तत् त्वा॑ यामि सु॒वीर्यं॒ तद् ब्रह्म॑ पू॒र्वचि॑त्तये । येना॒ यति॑भ्यो॒ भृग॑वे॒ धने॑ हि॒ते येन॒ प्रस्क॑ण्व॒मावि॑थ
tát tvā yā́mi suvī́ryaṁ tád bráhma pūrvácittayé | yéna yátibhyo bhṛ́gave dháne hité yéna práskaṇvam ā́vitha ||
To that thy noble hero-power I come; to that holy utterance for the ancient forethought: whereby for the Yatis, for Bhṛgu, wealth was set in place; whereby thou didst succour Praskaṇva.
Zu jener deiner edlen Heldenkraft komme ich; zu jenem Brahman, dem heiligen Spruch, um der uralten Voraussicht willen: wodurch den Yatis, dem Bhṛgu, Reichtum festgesetzt wurde; wodurch du Praskaṇva beigestanden hast.
The speaker approaches Indra’s noble hero-power and that brahman (sacred utterance) for ancient forethought—by which wealth was set for the Yatis and for Bhṛgu, and by which Indra aided Praskaṇva.
Efficacy is grounded in precedent: the mind trusts the mantra because it remembers successful earlier rescues. ‘Brahman’ here is operative speech—strategic intelligence and sacred articulation that unlocks aid and resources.
Tradition is a technology of memory: when tested words are spoken with understanding, they reconnect the present to a lineage of solutions and protections.
To access Indra’s ‘suvīrya’ through brahman (mantra-power), leveraging precedent cases of aid for wealth and protection.
तत् । त्वा । यामि । सुवीर्यम् । तत् । ब्रह्म । पूर्वचित्तये । येन । यतिभ्यः । भृगवे । धने । हिते । येन । प्रस्कण्वम् । आविथ ।
Sāyaṇa construes ‘brahma’ as the potent mantra itself, not mere praise: it is ‘pūrvacittaye’ because it is grounded in the insight of the ancients (pūrvair dṛṣṭa). The historical exempla (Yatis, Bhṛgu, Praskaṇva) function as ‘itihāsa-pramāṇa’—past successful applications validating present invocation.
Praskaṇva (named as beneficiary in the verse; original RV seer for the surrounding hymn-cycle is RV-traditional, but AV 20 transmits as a unit)
Indra-stuti with itihāsa/precedent validation; brahman as efficacious speech.
By naming earlier beneficiaries (Yatis, Bhṛgu, Praskaṇva), the verse functions like a juridical citation: ‘Indra has done this before; therefore he will do it now’—a common Atharvanic logic of guarantee.
Indra
Patron of brahman (effective utterance) and giver of dhana; defender of inspired speakers and their communities.
Protection of the petitioner through precedent: Indra as rescuer, wealth-setter, ally of the righteous.
4×11
Narrative/proof-text style within triṣṭubh; AV chanting may emphasize proper names (Yati, Bhṛgu, Praskaṇva) as performative anchors.
Declarative and authoritative; ‘citation’ rhythm.
Builds confidence through remembered success-stories; strengthens resolve and trust in mantra efficacy.
State the saṅkalpa: acquisition/establishment of dhana and protection.
Recite the mantra before or during oblations, explicitly ‘approaching’ Indra through brahman.
Optionally name exemplars (Bhṛgu, Praskaṇva) as ritual ‘proofs’ to strengthen resolve and efficacy.
Kauśika Sūtra: Indra-mantras used as ‘brahma’ in prosperity and protection sequences; recited to authenticate the rite by precedent (pūrvavat).
Atharvan priest as custodian of ‘brahma’ (effective formula), ensuring correct recitation and contextual framing (pūrvacitti/itihāsa).
Recite before making major financial decisions, beginning a rite of prosperity, or seeking protection for a journey; can accompany a small offering and a vow of truthful speech.
Before sunrise or before undertaking; on auspicious days for new starts.
Purohita may frame it as an Indra-stuti with ‘precedent’ narration; householder can recite as a confidence charm.
Used before interviews/exams as a ‘lineage of success’ recollection, paired with practical preparation.
brahman (mantra as operative substance); dhana (wealth)
Here the ‘substance’ is vāc itself: brahman is treated as a potent medium that stores ancestral forethought and releases it as protection and prosperity.
Affirmation grounded in evidence/precedent—helpful for resilience and self-efficacy in hardship.
Petitioner seeking dhana and support.
Access Indra’s suvīrya through brahman; obtain wealth/protection validated by precedent cases.
Itihāsa-validation (precedent citation) + brahman-as-substance: the mantra itself is the instrument that ‘opens’ Indra’s aid.
Misfortune, poverty, abandonment, failure of plans.
Wealth set in place (dhane hite), protection of undertakings.
Brahman as ‘ancient forethought’: let speech become precise, truthful, and empowered.
vishuddha (speech)
Slow breathing; chant on exhale to stabilize voice and intention.
Confident, lineage-connected, articulate.
Chant 9 or 27 times; then speak one clear, truthful intention aloud and write one concrete step—uniting brahman (speech) with karma (action).
Authoritative, mid-register; slight emphasis on proper names and on brahma/pūrvacittaye.
Keep tat tvā yāmi as a firm opening; do not rush the list: yati-bhyo bhṛgave … praskaṇvam.
Clear, declarative, steady.
For Atharvanic ‘proof’ mantras, clarity of names/functions is part of efficacy—treat them as ritual ‘citations’.
9 times
Seeking protection and financial stabilization; needing confidence rooted in tradition; beginning a long project.
Before signing agreements, starting study, approaching authorities, or initiating a prosperity rite.
Increased confidence, clarity of speech, sense of supported effort; traditional attraction of dhana and protection.
Avoid using to rationalize risky decisions; pair with due diligence and ethical conduct.
Again no herb; the ‘substance’ is brahman itself—speech treated as a transferable force. The verse explicitly theorizes efficacy: mantra works because it is ‘pūrvacitti’ (validated by ancestral insight) and because it has produced dhana for named recipients.
It foregrounds lineages and exemplary beneficiaries (Bhṛgu, yatis, named seer), implying that access to divine aid is mediated by recognized ascetic/priestly figures and by authorized tradition (‘pūrvacitti’).
The relative-correlative structure (yena… yena…) and the use of brahma as potent utterance are RV-typical. The explicit self-reflexive emphasis on brahma as instrument aligns well with late-RV/AV ritualization of speech.
Gopatha frequently treats brahman/mantra as a quasi-substance that ‘supports’ the rite; this verse’s ‘pūrvacitti’ aligns with that ideology: efficacy is secured by traditional knowledge and correct deployment, not by novelty.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.