अयोध्यायाः पौरविलापः
Lament of the Citizens of Ayodhya on Rama’s Absence
Setting: Ayodhya
शोकजाश्रुपरिद्यूना वीक्षमाणास्ततस्ततः ।
आलोकमपि रामस्य न पश्यन्ति स्म दुःखिताः ॥२॥
śokajāśruparidyūnā vīkṣamāṇās tataḥ tataḥ |
ālokam api rāmasya na paśyanti sma duḥkhitāḥ ||2||
Bị nỗi sầu làm hao mòn, lệ tuôn đẫm mặt, họ nhìn ngó khắp nơi; nhưng trong khổ đau vẫn chẳng thấy dù chỉ một dấu vết của Rāma.
Anguished and drenched with tears of grief they looked hither and thither but could not find even a trace of Rama.
Collective grief reveals dependence on righteous leadership; yet the search that finds no ‘trace’ underscores impermanence of worldly proximity.
Practice of smaraṇa in separation; transforming grief into steady remembrance.
The mind (citta) seeks the ‘seer/light’ but, when veiled by grief (śoka), fails to apprehend even a trace—like avidyā obscuring recognition.
Motif of ‘āloka/tejas’ as knowledge-light (e.g., ‘tam eva bhāntam…’ style resonance: without the luminous one, nothing is seen).
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.47.19 (continuation: their pitiable speech); Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.48 (Ayodhya’s continuing lament)
Bhakti literature’s ‘darśana’ longing (later parallels: Rāmacaritamānasa Ayodhyākāṇḍa lament passages)
Ayodhyākāṇḍa: citizens repeatedly ‘look’ toward the path of departure
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Grieving
Vilambita with soft niṣāda descent on ‘duḥkhitāḥ’
Dharma here appears as steadfast loyalty to a righteous leader; the citizens’ grief signals how deeply Rāma is associated with moral order and protection.
After Rāma’s departure for exile, the people of Ayodhyā search desperately but cannot find even a trace of him.
Rāma’s perceived virtue as a dhārmic protector is emphasized indirectly—his absence creates disorientation and sorrow among the people.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.