Sukta 7.86
पृच्छे तदेनो वरुण दिदृक्षूपो एमि चिकितुषो विपृच्छम् । समानमिन्मे कवयश्चिदाहुरयं ह तुभ्यं वरुणो हृणीते ॥
pṛ́cche tád éno váruṇa didṛ́kṣū́po émi cikítuṣo ví-pṛccham | samānám ín me kaváyaś cid āhur ayáṃ ha túbhyaṃ váruṇo hṛṇīte ||
मैं अपनी गलती के बारे में पूछ रहा हूँ, वरुण। मैं समझना चाहता हूँ कि मैंने क्या गलत किया। रिशि भी यही कहते हैं कि तुम मुझसे नाराज़ हो। लगता है मैंने कोई तोड़ दिया है।
The poet asks about his fault, approaches to question a knower, and hears even sages say that Varuṇa is offended with him.
The seeker wants to *see* the inner deviation (eno) clearly (didṛkṣu): not vague guilt but precise insight. He approaches the ‘knower’—either the illumined part within or a realized guide—because the ordinary mind rationalizes. The consensus of the ‘kavayaḥ’ indicates an impersonal truth: the inner law (Varuṇa) registers disharmony. Offence is not Divine anger but the felt withdrawal of peace when one departs from ṛta.
Growth requires honest diagnosis of error; when we violate our deeper truth, we feel a loss of inner harmony. Guidance—inner or outer—helps convert shame into clarity and correction.
Introspection, Confession, Seeking knowledge of fault, Divine displeasure as loss of harmony
Maṇḍala 7 seer-family; strong emphasis on ethical-spiritual alignment with Ādityas, especially Varuṇa.
Here Vasiṣṭha models the yogic move from emotional remorse to luminous inquiry—turning ‘sin’ into a knowable psychological cause that can be transformed.
Registrar and enforcer of ṛta; the cosmic intelligence that maintains harmony and exposes falsehood.
The inner judge that is simultaneously healer—by revealing the precise point of deviation.
Confessional/expiatory recitation within Varuṇa invocations; used when seeking to identify transgression affecting ritual efficacy.
पृ॒च्छे तदेनो॑ वरुण दि॒दृक्षूपो॑ एमि चिकि॒तुषो॑ वि॒पृच्छ॑म् । स॒मा॒नमिन्मे॑ क॒वय॑श्चिदाहुर॒यं ह॒ तुभ्यं॒ वरु॑णो हृणीते ॥
पृ॒च्छे । तत् । एनः॑ । व॒रु॒ण॒ । दि॒दृक्षु॑ । उपो॒ इति॑ । ए॒मि॒ । चि॒कि॒तुषः॑ । वि॒ऽपृच्छ॑म् । स॒मा॒नम् । इत् । मे॒ । क॒वयः॑ । चि॒त् । आ॒हुः॒ । अ॒यम् । ह॒ । तुभ्य॑म् । वरु॑णः । हृ॒णी॒ते॒ ॥
pṛcche | tat | enaḥ | varuṇa | didṛkṣu | upo iti | emi | cikituṣaḥ | vi-pṛccham | samānam | it | me | kavayaḥ | cit | āhuḥ | ayam | ha | tubhyam | varuṇaḥ | hṛṇīte
44
4×11 syllables (approx.)
Interrogative, stepping rhythm—like approaching and questioning; triṣṭubh supports argument and discernment.
Stabilizes the mind into inquiry; reduces emotional turbulence by giving it a measured cadence.
Confessional-analytical segment: identifying the ‘eno’ before seeking release; used as a model for self-scrutiny in later tradition.
Before corrective rites (prāyaścitta) or when a sense of impurity/obstruction arises.
Questioning and acknowledgment, followed by offerings meant to restore harmony with ṛta.
Journaling-meditation mantra: repeat didṛkṣu and ask, ‘What exactly is misaligned?’ then listen without self-blame.
éno ‘fault’ is treated as something to be ‘seen’ (didṛkṣū), implying ignorance/constriction rather than merely legal transgression. √cit (cikituṣaḥ) highlights discrimination/awareness as the remedy. √hṛṇ (hṛṇīte) marks the felt withdrawal of harmony with ṛta.
self-knowledge as purification (didṛkṣū…cikituṣaḥ), eno as inner constriction/ignorance, alignment with ṛta via discernment
Fault is defined as departure from ṛta; restoration begins with seeing the departure.
Truth is *seen* (didṛkṣā) and spoken; the sages’ unanimity suggests objective satya beyond preference.
Knowledge as a restoring power—right seeing re-establishes harmony in the formed being.
Integral-psychological reading: conscience as cosmic law within; error as obscuration rather than moral damnation.
unspecified
unspecified
Approaching the knower = turning inward/upward toward the witnessing intelligence; ‘offence’ = eclipse of inner sky.
Didṛkṣā: cultivate the will to see the exact movement of falsehood (avoidance, exaggeration, fear) and name it.
Ajna (clear seeing)
Nadi-śodhana (gentle alternate nostril) 6–8 rounds, then chant once with long pauses after pṛcche and hṛṇīte.
Witnessing clarity; remorse converts into insight.
Ask inwardly: (1) What is the ‘eno’—the specific distortion? (2) What is its motive-force? (3) What truthful action restores harmony today? End by offering the insight to Varuṇa as inner law.
Tri-svara; emphasize udātta on pṛcche, eno, didṛkṣu, cikituṣaḥ, hṛṇīte according to accent marks; keep interrogatives crisp.
Make pāda breaks clear; slightly lift pitch on didṛkṣu and settle downward on hṛṇīte to convey recognition.
pṛcche: clear conjunct ‘pṛc-che’ (not ‘priche’)., didṛkṣu: retroflex ṛ, and ‘kṣu’ as kṣ + u., cikituṣaḥ: ‘ci-ki-tu-ṣaḥ’ with ṣ retroflex., hṛṇīte: aspirate hṛ-, long ī.
Clear, inquiry-toned, not lamenting; steady breath support.
9
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.