Varaha Purana 5.30 — Adhyaya 5, Shloka 30
Reconciliation of Action and Knowledge: Offering All Acts to Nārāyaṇa and the Hymn to the Yajña-Puruṣa
ततोऽब्रवील्लुब्धकस्तु ब्राह्मणं तं तपोधनम् । भगवन् या त्वया ज्वाला गृहोतासीद्धुताशनात् । प्रयच्छ येन मार्गाणि मांसान्यानाय्य भक्षये ॥ ५.३० ॥
tato 'bravīl lubdhakas tu brāhmaṇaṃ taṃ tapodhanam | bhagavan yā tvayā jvālā gṛhotāsīd dhutāśanāt | prayaccha yena mārgāṇi māṃsāny ānāyya bhakṣaye || 5.30 ||
پھر اس لالچی شکاری نے اس تپودھن برہمن سے کہا—“اے بھگون، آپ کے گھر میں ہُتاشن سے جو شعلہ اٹھا تھا، اس کا طریقہ مجھے عطا کیجیے؛ تاکہ میں گوشت لا کر کھانے کے لیے راستے (وسائل) حاصل کر سکوں۔”
Lubdhaka (the hunter)
Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":false,"aspect_highlighted":"None","boar_form_detail":"None","earth_interaction":"None"}
Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":true,"speaker_role":"questioner","bhu_devi_state":"None","key_question":"How can I obtain a means (‘paths’) to procure meat and eat, using the power/technique connected with the flame from your house?"}
Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false,"specific_site":"None","parikrama_context":"None","krishna_connection":"None"}
Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"topic":"None","instruction_summary":"A brāhmaṇa’s sacred power/household fire is not to be instrumentalized to facilitate hiṃsā or indulgence; the hunter’s request exemplifies adharmic appropriation of tapas-tejas.","karmic_consequence":"Using spiritual authority to enable violence increases pāpa and hardens greed; refusing such counsel preserves dharma and protects both parties from complicity."}
Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false,"vrata_name":"None","tithi_month":"None","promised_fruit":"None"}
Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":true,"symbolic_interpretation":"The hunter’s desire to turn ‘jvālā’ into a technology for meat-eating dramatizes the misdirection of sacred energy toward sense-objects—tejas diverted from yajña to bhoga.","yajna_varaha_imagery":"Household/ritual fire (gārhapatya-like sanctity) contrasted with profane consumption; ‘mārga’ as ritual path vs predatory path—two trajectories for the same energy.","vedantic_connection":"When buddhi serves vāsanā, knowledge becomes cunning; dharmic discrimination is required to prevent śakti from becoming bondage."}
Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"dharma-ethics","core_concept":"Not every capability should be taught or transferred; knowledge must be governed by dharma and intention.","practical_application":"Decline requests that would weaponize your skills for harm; align instruction with compassion and restraint."}
Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Asceticism","Social Conduct","Dialogue Narrative"]
Primary Rasa: bibhatsa
Secondary Rasa: karuna
Type: None
Related Themes: Varāha Purāṇa 5.5.30–31 (request followed by discovery that the fire is gone at the root)
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"A hunter (lubdhaka) petitions an austere brāhmaṇa, asking for a method connected to the flame, with implied intent of hunting and meat consumption.","item_prompts":["hunter with bow/knife implied","brāhmaṇa with ascetic marks","gesture of request (añjali or pointing)","faint memory/depiction of flame","contrast of purity vs appetite"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural: strong moral contrast through color—hunter in darker tones, brāhmaṇa luminous; expressive dialogue gestures; subtle flame motif in background.","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore: ornate brāhmaṇa figure with gold accents; hunter rendered with earthy palette; symbolic meat/hunt motifs kept minimal but legible; didactic framing.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore: refined, calm brāhmaṇa; hunter’s anxious eagerness; emphasis on facial expression and hand gestures; restrained background.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari: narrative clarity—two figures facing; minimal props; psychological tension conveyed through posture and gaze."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"didactic-tension","suggested_raga":"Darbari Kanada","pace":"medium-slow","voice_tone":"serious, morally weighted"}
FAQs
It reflects a common Purāṇic narrative technique: ethical inquiry is staged through dialogue between socially distinct figures (here, a hunter and an ascetic brāhmaṇa), allowing the text to frame moral reasoning through everyday conflicts of livelihood and restraint.
No specific geographic site is named in this verse; the setting is described generically as the brāhmaṇa’s house and a fire arising there.
The verse introduces a tension between ascetic power (tapas) and worldly appetite (consumption of meat). Its ethical thrust is preparatory: it sets up a request that will likely be evaluated or corrected by the ascetic figure in subsequent verses.
Ask anything about this verse
Curious about the meaning, context, or a word? Ask, and continue the conversation in the Vedapath app.
A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with audio, word-by-word meanings, and more.