Description of the Northern Regions: Ramyaka, Hiraṇmaya, Uttarakuru, Candradvīpa, Sūryadvīpa, and Rudrākara
लकुचाः क्षुद्रसा वृक्षास्तस्मिन् देशे व्यवस्थिताः । तत्फलप्राशमानाः हि तेन जीवन्ति मानवाः ॥ ८४.६ ॥
lakucāḥ kṣudrasā vṛkṣās tasmin deśe vyavasthitāḥ | tatphalaprāśamānā hi tena jīvanti mānavāḥ || 84.6 ||
Di wilayah itu terdapat pokok lakuca yang bergetah sedikit (atau hasilnya kecil), tegak berdiri di sana. Sesungguhnya manusia hidup di situ dengan memakan buahnya.
Varāha (default speaker in Varāha–Pṛthivī dialogue framework)
It preserves a micro-ecological note typical of Purāṇic geographic catalogues: named flora (lakuca) is linked to human subsistence, offering evidence for how texts mapped landscapes through resources and livelihoods.
The verse refers generically to “that region” (tasmin deśe) without naming a specific toponym in this fragment; a precise modern identification would require the surrounding verses of Adhyāya 84.
Rather than a direct injunction, the verse conveys a philosophical observation about human dependence on local flora—an implicit ecological theme highlighting resource-based habitation and the sustaining role of fruit-bearing trees.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.