Mohinī-ākhyāna: The Trial of Ekādaśī and the King’s Satya-saṅkalpa
होमोच्छिष्टप्रभोक्तारस्त्रयो वर्णाः प्रकीर्तिताः । विशेषाद्भूमिपालानां कथं युक्तमुपोषणम् ॥ ४ ॥
homocchiṣṭaprabhoktārastrayo varṇāḥ prakīrtitāḥ | viśeṣādbhūmipālānāṃ kathaṃ yuktamupoṣaṇam || 4 ||
教えによれば、三つの二度生まれの階層(ドヴィジャ)は、ホーマ供犠の供物の残りをいただくという。とりわけ大地を護る王たちにとって、断食がどうして相応しいと言えようか。
Narada (questioning/raising a doubt within the dialogue addressed to the Sanatkumara tradition)
Vrata: none
Rasa: {"primary_rasa":"shanta","secondary_rasa":"bhakti","emotional_journey":"A reasoned doubt is raised about dharma-practice (fasting) for kings, moving from citation of tradition to a pointed question."}
The verse frames a dharmic tension between continual ritual/feeding obligations (homa and its remnants) and the ascetic discipline of fasting, especially for rulers whose duties require public, sustaining action.
By questioning when fasting is truly “appropriate,” the verse implicitly points to regulated observance—vrata as devotion guided by dharma and role-based duty, not as mere self-denial.
It highlights ritual practice (kalpa/śrauta-smārta procedure) concerning homa and the status of ucchiṣṭa (sanctified remnants), and how such ritual norms intersect with vrata disciplines like upoṣaṇa.