HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 10Shloka 2
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Vibhuti Yoga, Shloka 2

Vibhuti Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 2 illustration

न मे विदुः सुरगणाः प्रभवं न महर्षयः । अहमादिर्हि देवानां महर्षीणां च सर्वशः ॥ १०.२ ॥

na me viduḥ sura-gaṇāḥ prabhavaṁ na maharṣayaḥ | aham ādir hi devānāṁ maharṣīṇāṁ ca sarvaśaḥ || 10.2 ||

Neither the hosts of gods nor the great seers know My origin; for in every way I am the source of the gods and the great seers.

Neither the hosts of gods nor the great seers know My origin; for I am the source of the gods and the great seers in every way.

The groups of gods do not know My emergence, nor do the great seers; for I am indeed the origin of the gods and of the great seers entirely.

‘prabhava’ may be translated ‘origin,’ ‘emergence,’ or ‘sourcehood.’ The claim is theological and hierarchical: even exalted beings are derivative relative to Krishna’s ultimacy. Interpretations differ on whether this is personal-theistic (a supreme deity) or metaphysical (the absolute ground of being).

not
:
Root
मेof me / my
मे:
Rootअस्मद्
विदुःknow
विदुः:
Root√विद् (ज्ञाने)
सुरगणाःthe hosts of gods
सुरगणाः:
Karta
Rootसुरगण
प्रभवम्origin / source
प्रभवम्:
Karma
Rootप्रभव
nor / not
:
Root
महर्षयःthe great seers
महर्षयः:
Karta
Rootमहर्षि
अहम्I
अहम्:
Karta
Rootअस्मद्
आदिःthe beginning / first cause
आदिः:
Karta
Rootआदि
हिindeed / for
हि:
Rootहि
देवानाम्of the gods
देवानाम्:
Rootदेव
महर्षीणाम्of the great seers
महर्षीणाम्:
Rootमहर्षि
and
:
Root
सर्वशःin every way / entirely
सर्वशः:
Rootसर्वशस्
Krishna
Īśvara-tattva (nature of the Lord)CausalityCosmological hierarchy
Supremacy of the divine sourceLimits of even exalted knowledgeGround-of-being theology

FAQs

It cautions against overreliance on authority figures: even the most revered sources may have limits, encouraging intellectual humility and openness to deeper inquiry.

It asserts a first-principle status for Krishna: all celestial and sage-like powers are derivative, implying an ultimate causal ground that is not fully objectifiable by subordinate beings.

This sets up the vibhūti discourse by establishing Krishna’s primacy over the cosmos and its intelligences, legitimizing the ensuing catalog of manifestations.

As a general principle, it supports epistemic humility: complex systems (nature, consciousness, society) may exceed the grasp of any single expert community.