HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 2Shloka 26
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Sankhya Yoga, Shloka 26

Sankhya Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 26 illustration

अथ चैनं नित्यजातं नित्यं वा मन्यसे मृतम् । तथापि त्वं महाबाहो नैवं शोचितुमर्हसि ॥ २.२६ ॥

atha cainaṁ nityajātaṁ nityaṁ vā manyase mṛtam | tathāpi tvaṁ mahābāho naivaṁ śocitum arhasi || 2.26 ||

Even if you think this self is ever born and ever dies, even then, O mighty-armed, you should not grieve in this way.

Even if you think this self is perpetually born and perpetually dies, even then, O mighty-armed, you should not grieve thus.

But if you suppose this (self/person) to be always born or always dead, even then, O strong-armed one, you are not fit to mourn in this manner.

This verse is often read as a concessive argument: even granting a more materialist or cyclic-birth interpretation, grief is still philosophically unwarranted because change is inevitable.

अथnow; then; further
अथ:
Rootअथ
and
:
Root
एनम्this (one), him (i.e., the Self)
एनम्:
Karma
Rootइदम् (एतद्)
नित्यजातम्ever-born; always coming to birth
नित्यजातम्:
Karma
Rootनित्यजात (प्रातिपदिकम्)
नित्यम्always; perpetually
नित्यम्:
Rootनित्य (प्रातिपदिकम्)
वाor
वा:
Rootवा
मन्यसेyou think; you consider
मन्यसे:
Karta
Root√मन् (मन्यते)
मृतम्dead; as dead
मृतम्:
Karma
Rootमृत (प्रातिपदिकम्; √मृ)
तथाthus; in that way
तथा:
Rootतथा
अपिeven; although
अपि:
Rootअपि
त्वम्you
त्वम्:
Karta
Rootयुष्मद्
महाबाहोO mighty-armed one
महाबाहो:
Rootमहाबाहु (प्रातिपदिकम्)
not
:
Root
एवम्thus; in this manner
एवम्:
Rootएवम्
शोचितुम्to grieve; to lament
शोचितुम्:
Root√शुच् (शोचति)
अर्हसिyou ought; you are fit (to)
अर्हसि:
Root√अर्ह् (अर्हति)
KrishnaArjuna
Anityatā (impermanence)Śoka (grief)Tarka (reasoned argument)
Concessive reasoningPractical consolationDetachment from outcomes

FAQs

It reduces catastrophic thinking by emphasizing that if change is constant, intense fixation on preventing it becomes psychologically counterproductive.

Krishna temporarily brackets the doctrine of an unchanging self and argues that even under an alternative view (continuous birth/death), grief lacks a stable target.

This continues a layered persuasion strategy: multiple philosophical standpoints are used to address Arjuna’s paralysis.

When facing unavoidable transitions (aging, career shifts), one can adopt a stance of acceptance rather than self-reproach or prolonged mourning.