HomeBhagavad GitaCh. 18Shloka 20
Previous Verse
Next Verse

Bhagavad Gita — Moksha Sannyasa Yoga, Shloka 20

Moksha Sannyasa Yoga

Bhagavad Gita 20 illustration

सर्वभूतेषु येनैकं भावमव्ययमीक्षते । अविभक्तं विभक्तेषु तज्ज्ञानं विद्धि सात्त्विकम् ॥ १८.२० ॥

sarvabhūteṣu yenaikaṁ bhāvam avyayam īkṣate | avibhaktaṁ vibhakteṣu taj jñānaṁ viddhi sāttvikam || 18.20 ||

That knowledge by which one beholds the one imperishable Being in all beings—undivided amid the divided—know that knowledge to be sāttvika.

जिस ज्ञान के द्वारा मनुष्य समस्त प्राणियों में एक अविनाशी भाव (सत्ता) को देखता है, जो विभक्तों में अविभक्त है—उस ज्ञान को सात्त्विक जानो।

That knowledge by which one sees one imperishable being/state in all beings—undivided among the divided—know that knowledge to be sattvic.

Traditional interpreters often read ‘ekaṁ bhāvam’ as the one Self/Brahman present in all, aligning with non-dual or theistic unity-in-diversity. Academic-literal translation keeps ‘bhāva’ open as ‘being/state/essence’, allowing multiple philosophical construals (Advaita, Viśiṣṭādvaita, etc.).

सर्वभूतेषुin all beings
सर्वभूतेषु:
Adhikarana
Rootसर्वभूत
येनby which (knowledge)
येन:
Karana
Rootयद्
एकम्one (single)
एकम्:
Karma
Rootएक
भावम्being; essential nature; state of existence
भावम्:
Karma
Rootभाव
अव्ययम्imperishable; unchanging
अव्ययम्:
Rootअव्यय
ईक्षतेsees; beholds
ईक्षते:
Root√ईक्ष्
अविभक्तम्undivided; not separated
अविभक्तम्:
Rootअविभक्त
विभक्तेषुamong the divided (entities)
विभक्तेषु:
Adhikarana
Rootविभक्त
तत्that
तत्:
Rootतद्
ज्ञानम्knowledge
ज्ञानम्:
Karta
Rootज्ञान
विद्धिknow (you); understand
विद्धि:
Root√विद्
सात्त्विकम्sattvic; pertaining to sattva
सात्त्विकम्:
Rootसात्त्विक
Krishna
JñānaSattvaUnity of beingĀtman/Brahman (interpretive)
Non-fragmented perceptionMetaphysical unityClarity and discernment

FAQs

Sattvic knowledge is portrayed as integrative perception: it reduces reactive fragmentation by recognizing a shared, enduring dimension across persons and situations, supporting empathy and steadiness.

It asserts an imperishable principle present across the multiplicity of beings. Philosophical schools interpret this as the Self, Brahman, or a single underlying reality that is not divided by empirical distinctions.

This is the first of three definitions of knowledge by guṇa, setting sattva as clarity that apprehends unity rather than mere plurality.

In pluralistic settings, it can be read as a discipline of seeing common dignity or shared consciousness beneath social and psychological differences, improving ethical decision-making.