Moksha Sannyasa Yoga
पृथक्त्वेन तु यज्ज्ञानं नानाभावान्पृथग्विधान् । वेत्ति सर्वेषु भूतेषु तज्ज्ञानं विद्धि राजसम् ॥ १८.२१ ॥
pṛthaktvena tu yaj jñānaṁ nānābhāvān pṛthagvidhān | vetti sarveṣu bhūteṣu taj jñānaṁ viddhi rājasam || 18.21 ||
But that knowledge by which one knows, in all beings, manifold states as separate and diverse—know that knowledge to be rājasika.
परन्तु जिस ज्ञान के द्वारा मनुष्य समस्त प्राणियों में नाना प्रकार के पृथक्-पृथक् भावों को अलग-अलग देखता है, उस ज्ञान को राजस जानो।
But that knowledge which, in all beings, knows the various states as distinct and of different kinds—know that knowledge to be rajasic.
Traditional glosses often treat rajasic knowledge as overemphasis on difference leading to attachment and rivalry. Academic-literal readings describe it as cognition that apprehends plurality and separateness; the evaluative dimension (why it is ‘rajasic’) is inferred from the broader guṇa framework.
Rajasic knowledge prioritizes distinctions—types, roles, comparisons—which can be useful for practical tasks but may also fuel restlessness, competitiveness, and attachment to outcomes.
It represents a standpoint that treats plurality as primary and does not (or cannot) see an underlying unity as decisive; thus it remains within the domain of differentiated phenomena.
It contrasts with the previous verse’s integrative sattvic vision, showing how guṇa-conditioning shapes what counts as ‘knowledge’.
It can describe analytic but divisive thinking—e.g., reducing people to categories. The Gītā’s framing invites balancing necessary differentiation with a unifying ethical outlook.