Varaha Purana 5.21 — Adhyaya 5, Shloka 21
Reconciliation of Action and Knowledge: Offering All Acts to Nārāyaṇa and the Hymn to the Yajña-Puruṣa
एतच्छ्रुत्वा वचो व्याधः स्मितपूर्वमिदं वचः । उवाच नाहं हिंसामि पृथग्जीवं द्विजोत्तम ॥ ५.२१ ॥
etac chrutvā vaco vyādhaḥ smitapūrvam idaṃ vacaḥ | uvāca nāhaṃ hiṃsāmi pṛthagjīvaṃ dvijottama || 5.21 ||
ครั้นได้ฟังถ้อยคำนั้น นายพรานยิ้มก่อนแล้วกล่าวว่า “โอทวิชะผู้ประเสริฐ ข้าพเจ้าไม่เบียดเบียนสัตว์มีชีวิตโดยถือว่าเป็นสิ่งแยกต่างหากจากตน”
Vyādha (the hunter)
Varaha Avatara Context: {"is_varaha_focus":false,"aspect_highlighted":"None","boar_form_detail":"None","earth_interaction":"None"}
Bhu Devi Dialogue: {"is_dialogue":true,"speaker_role":"questioner","bhu_devi_state":"None","key_question":"Can violence be justified by claiming non-duality—‘I do not kill another, separate being’—and what is true ethical non-separateness?"}
Mathura Mandala: {"is_mathura_related":false,"specific_site":"None","parikrama_context":"None","krishna_connection":"None"}
Dharma Shastra: {"has_dharma_rule":true,"topic":"None","instruction_summary":"Warns (implicitly) against sophistic misuse of metaphysics: the hunter claims non-separateness to deny hiṃsā; dharma requires that non-duality not become a license for harm.","karmic_consequence":"If used to excuse violence: increased pāpa through hypocrisy and delusion; if corrected into genuine compassion: movement toward dharma and inner purification (implied)."}
Vrata Mahatmya: {"has_vrata":false,"vrata_name":"None","tithi_month":"None","promised_fruit":"None"}
Cosmic Boar Symbolism: {"has_symbolism":true,"symbolic_interpretation":"Non-separateness (abheda) is invoked; the verse sets up a contrast between true Vedāntic insight (which yields compassion) and distorted ‘abheda’ used to rationalize hiṃsā.","yajna_varaha_imagery":"None (no explicit Yajña-Varāha body-mapping here)","vedantic_connection":"Abheda/ātma-sāmya rhetoric: authentic realization of one Self in all beings supports ahiṃsā; mere verbal non-duality without ethical transformation is avidyā-driven."}
Philosophical Teaching: {"has_teaching":true,"teaching_type":"ethics + epistemic humility","core_concept":"Metaphysical language (non-duality) must culminate in compassion; otherwise it becomes a mask for desire and violence.","practical_application":"Examine one’s motives when citing philosophy; treat ‘all is self’ as a reason to protect beings, not to exploit them."}
Subject Matter: ["Ethics","Non-violence discourse","Self–other distinction in moral reasoning"]
Primary Rasa: vīra
Secondary Rasa: śānta
Type: forest moral-theatre
Related Themes: Varāha Purāṇa: frequent didactic use of dialogue to expose wrong reasoning and re-establish dharma
Visual Art Cues: {"scene_description":"The hunter smiles and delivers a clever-sounding claim of non-separateness while still holding the bow—an unsettling contrast between words and intent.","item_prompts":["hunter with faint smile","bow and arrow still ready","brāhmaṇa facing him, attentive/critical","deer in distance","visual contrast: soft smile vs weapon tension"],"kerala_mural_prompt":"Kerala mural: expressive eyes and smita; weapon rendered boldly; brāhmaṇa’s composed scrutiny; symbolic contrast through color (cool calm vs dark intent).","tanjore_prompt":"Tanjore: hunter centered with gold accents on weaponry; subtle ironic halo avoided; brāhmaṇa as moral counterbalance; ornate but tense tableau.","mysore_prompt":"Mysore: nuanced facial expression (smile), realistic bow tension; brāhmaṇa’s thoughtful gaze; subdued palette to highlight ethical ambiguity.","pahari_prompt":"Pahari: crisp dialogue scene; hunter’s smile clearly drawn; minimal props; deer as small motif underscoring stakes."}
Audio Atmosphere: {"recitation_mood":"debate-like, slightly ironic, probing","suggested_raga":"Todi","pace":"medium","voice_tone":"controlled, pointed emphasis on ‘na aham hiṃsāmi… pṛthak-jīvam’ to signal philosophical tension"}
FAQs
It reflects a Purāṇic narrative technique where ethical instruction is delivered through dialogue, here framing moral reasoning (harm and non-harm) in relation to how one conceives of other beings.
No geographic location is explicitly named in this verse fragment.
The verse foregrounds a principle of restraint from harming living beings, expressed through the idea that one should not treat a living being as wholly separate—an ethical stance that supports non-violence and moral regard for others.
Ask anything about this verse
A free Google sign-in keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Varaha Purana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with audio, word-by-word meanings, and more.