Adhyaya 75 — The Fall and Restoration of Revatī Nakṣatra and the Birth of Raivata Manu
ऋतवागुवाच यस्मान्ममैकपुत्रस्य रेवत्यन्तसमुद्भवम् ।
दौःशील्यमेतत्सा तस्मात् पततामाशु रेवती ॥
ṛtavāguvāca yasmān mamaikaputrasya revatyantasamudbhavam / dauḥśīlyam etat sā tasmāt patatām āśu revatī
ဩတဝာဂု (Ṛtavāgu) က ပြောသည်– «ငါ၏ တစ်ဦးတည်းသော သား၏ မကောင်းသော အကျင့်သည် ရေဝတျယန္တ (Revatyanta) ကြောင့် ပေါ်ပေါက်လာသဖြင့်၊ ထို့ကြောင့် ရေဝတီ (Revatī) သည် ထိုအခြေအနေမှ အလျင်အမြန် ကျဆင်းပါစေ»။
{ "primaryRasa": "raudra", "secondaryRasa": "dharma", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Purāṇic ethics often portray speech (vāk) of ascetics as potent: a curse is framed as a targeted corrective response to perceived moral harm. The caution is twofold—against causing moral downfall, and against the volatility of reactive judgment.
Vamśānucarita/ākhyāna (narrative account) with etiological intent; it supports later place-name and person-origin explanations rather than cosmological creation.
The ‘fall’ (patana) symbolizes descent of consciousness from a higher state due to distortion in conduct; the narrative externalizes inner ethical imbalance into a physical transformation/relocation.