परस्य दुर्निर्णयः—षट्कुलीयमुनिविवादः तथा ब्रह्मदर्शनार्थं मेरुप्रयाणम् | The Dispute of the Six-Lineage Sages on the Supreme and Their Journey to Brahmā at Meru
मुनय ऊचुः । भगवन्नंधकारेण महता वयमावृताः । खिन्ना विवदमानाश्च न पश्यामो ऽत्र यत्परम्
munaya ūcuḥ | bhagavannaṃdhakāreṇa mahatā vayamāvṛtāḥ | khinnā vivadamānāśca na paśyāmo 'tra yatparam
Para muni berkata: “Wahai Bhagavān, kami diselubungi kegelapan yang besar. Kami letih dan terperangkap dalam pertikaian, lalu di sini kami tidak melihat yang tertinggi dan melampaui.”
The sages (Munis), addressing the narrator/teacher in the Vāyavīyasaṃhitā context
Tattva Level: pasha
Shiva Form: Dakṣiṇāmūrti
Role: liberating
It portrays the classic Shaiva theme that ignorance (andhakāra) and mental contention obscure direct vision of the Supreme (Śiva as Pati). The sages admit their limitation and implicitly seek grace and right knowledge to move from bondage (pāśa) to clarity.
When the Supreme is not perceived due to inner darkness, Shaiva tradition turns to Saguna aids—Linga worship, mantra, and disciplined devotion—as concrete supports that steady the mind and lead it toward realizing the transcendent (yat-param) beyond form.
A practical takeaway is to counter “darkness” with japa of the Panchākṣarī (Om Namaḥ Śivāya) and steadying worship (pūjā/abhisheka). In Shaiva practice, this is often supported by wearing rudrākṣa and applying tripuṇḍra (bhasma) to cultivate clarity and detachment.