Prahlada’s Defeat by Nara-Narayana and Victory through Bhakti
एकदा निहते रौद्रो हिरण्यकशिपौ मुने अभिषिक्तस्तदा राज्ये प्रह्लादौ नाम दानवः
ekadā nihate raudro hiraṇyakaśipau mune abhiṣiktastadā rājye prahlādau nāma dānavaḥ
ឱ មុនី ម្តងមួយ កាលដែលហិរណ្យកសិពុ ដ៏សាហាវ ត្រូវបានសម្លាប់ហើយ នោះដានវៈម្នាក់ឈ្មោះ ប្រាហ្លាទៈ ត្រូវបានអភិសេកឡើងកាន់រាជ្យ។
{ "primaryRasa": "shanta", "secondaryRasa": "vira", "rasaIntensity": 0, "emotionalArcPosition": "", "moodDescriptors": [] }
Legitimacy of rule is framed through abhiṣeka and subsequent protection of dharma; even a Daitya ruler can be portrayed as upholding social-religious order when aligned with reverence for brāhmaṇas and ritual law.
Vamśānucarita: it continues dynastic narration among Daityas, marking a succession point after Hiraṇyakaśipu’s fall.
The transition from tyrannical power (Hiraṇyakaśipu) to a dharma-favoring reign (Prahlāda) symbolizes the Purāṇic motif that devotion and moral order can arise even within antagonistic lineages.