Bhīṣma’s Counsel on Reconciliation and Partition (भीष्मोपदेशः—संधि-राज्यविभागविचारः)
यथायं विहितो धर्मो यतश्चायं सनातन: । यथा च प्राह कौन्तेयस्तथा धर्मो न संशय:,जिस प्रकार और जिस कारणसे यह सनातन धर्मके अनुकूल कहा गया है और कुन्तीनन्दन युधिष्ठिरने जिस प्रकार इसकी धर्मानुकूलताका प्रतिपादन किया है, उसपर विचार करनेसे निस्संदेह यही सिद्ध होता है कि यह विवाह धर्मसम्मत है
yathāyaṁ vihito dharmo yataścāyaṁ sanātanaḥ | yathā ca prāha kaunteyastathā dharmo na saṁśayaḥ ||
Vyāsa said: “In the manner in which this dharma has been duly prescribed, and for the reason that it accords with the eternal order, and just as the son of Kuntī has argued it—so indeed it is dharma, without doubt.”
व्यास उवाच
That an action is to be accepted as dharma when it is both scripturally/authoritatively enjoined (vihita) and consistent with the eternal moral order (sanātana), and when sound reasoning by a competent authority (here, Kaunteya) supports it—hence it is ‘without doubt’ dharma.
Vyāsa delivers a concluding validation: he affirms that the disputed practice—contextually, the propriety of a particular marriage arrangement—fits established injunctions and the eternal dharma, and that Yudhiṣṭhira’s defense of its dharma-compatibility is correct.