The Greatness of Kubjāmraka: Raibhya’s Boon and the Teaching on the Sacred Tīrthas
Pūrva Bhāga · Tīrtha-Māhātmya (Sacred Geography)
गरुडो हन्ति नागान्वै दृष्ट्वैव विनतात्मजः ॥ एवं स वार्यमाणोऽपि व्यालीं हन्ति स्म दारुणम् ॥
garuḍo hanti nāgān vai dṛṣṭvaiva vinatātmajaḥ || evaṃ sa vāryamāṇo 'pi vyālīṃ hanti sma dāruṇam ||
garuDo hanti nAgAnvai dRRiShTvaiva vinatAtmajaH || evaM sa vAryamANo.api vyAlIM hanti sma dAruNam
गरुड, विनता का बेटा, साँप को देख के मार देता है। उसने उसे रोका भी, पर फिर भी उसने एक खतरनाक नागिन मारी।
Varāha
Listening, evaluating the ethical justification
Certain actions are portrayed as intrinsic to a being’s role in cosmic order; analogies can clarify but also risk oversimplifying moral agency.
Use scriptural analogies to examine motives: ask whether an act is truly necessary and role-consistent, or a rationalization for violence.
Illustrative ethic: some beings act according to svabhāva/dharma (Garuḍa vs nāgas); analogy is used to frame the inevitability/rightness (or at least the persistence) of slaying a dangerous vyālī despite restraint.
If aligned with one’s ordained protective duty and necessity, force may be framed as dharmic; if merely imitative or driven by cruelty, it accrues demerit (nuance implied beyond the analogy).
Vaiṣṇava mythic network via Garuḍa (Viṣṇu’s vāhana), but no Kṛṣṇa-specific link.
Continuation of the prince–vyālī episode; explanatory justification within the tīrtha-kathā
It reflects a common Purāṇic narrative motif: Garuḍa’s archetypal enmity with nāgas, used as a literary device within tīrtha-linked storytelling.
No explicit place-name appears in this verse; it functions as narrative setup within the chapter’s broader tīrtha discourse.
The verse foregrounds the problem of restraint—how powerful agents may act even when advised otherwise—inviting reflection on self-control and consequences.
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.