Valmiki Ramayana 2.35.37: Ayodhya Kanda, Sarga 35, Shloka 37
सुमन्त्रस्य कैकेयी-निन्दा
Sumantra’s Reproof of Kaikeyi in the Royal Assembly
Setting: Ayodhya palace assembly
नैव सा क्षुभ्यते देवी न च स्म परिदूयते ।
न चास्या मुखवर्णस्य विक्रिया लक्ष्यते तदा ॥३७॥
naiva sā kṣubhyate devī na ca sma paridūyate |
na cāsyā mukha-varṇasya vikriyā lakṣyate tadā ||37||
पर देवी एकदम हिल भी नहीं। न उसने कुछ पछतावा दिखाया। उसके चेहरे का रंग भी नहीं बदला, बिल्कुल नॉर्मल रहा।
Sandhi Notes
- na + eva → naiva (vowel sandhi: a + e = ai)
- ca + asyāḥ → cāsyā (vowel sandhi: a + a = ā with elision of initial a of asyāḥ)
(Despite the exhortations by Sumantra) Kaikeyi remained unperturbed. She did not feel sorry. There was no change in the expression of her face.इत्यार्षे श्रीमद्रामायणे वाल्मीकीय आदिकाव्ये अयोध्याकाण्डे पंचत्रिंशस्सर्गः।।Thus ends the thirtyfifth sarga of Ayodhyakanda of the holy Ramayana, the first epic composed by sage Valmiki.
The teaching
Outer composure is not virtue when divorced from remorse and dharma; obstinacy can masquerade as steadiness.
Duties in tension
- Queenly duty to protect dynasty/kingdom vs attachment-driven insistence on boons
- Compassion toward husband/stepson vs political ambition
- Ethical theme
- Adharma through moha (delusion)
For your practice
Self-audit: distinguish true equanimity from emotional numbness; cultivate remorse (hri) and discernment (viveka).
Mood and themes
- Rasa
- Bhayanaka (fear), with Raudra (fury)
- Mood
- Implacable, chilling, unyielding
Themes
- Dharma
- Ethics
- Itihasa
- Moral psychology
- Maryada
Avikāra here is not sāttvic equanimity but tamasic rigidity—outer stillness masking inner distortion; discernment between śānta and stambha (inertness).
Negative mirror of ‘sama-darśana’: steadiness without wisdom becomes spiritual inertia; true śānti is luminous, not numb.
- Kaikeyi and Sumantra
- Queen resisting minister’s counsel (cold/unyielding)
- Kaikeyi and Dasharatha
- Wife unmoved by husband’s suffering (indifferent)
- Kaikeyi and Rama
- Opponent to Rama’s enthronement (adversarial)
Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.12–2.14 (Kaikeyi’s unwavering demand); Vālmīki Rāmāyaṇa 2.35.36 (attempts to shake her)
Mahābhārata (portrayals of implacable resolve leading to catastrophe, e.g., Duryodhana’s obstinacy)
Ayodhyākāṇḍa characterization of Kaikeyi’s ‘niścaya’ as pivotal turning point
Anuṣṭup (śloka)
Solemn
Mandra-gambhīra
FAQs
It warns that when conscience and compassion are set aside, even righteous counsel may fail—highlighting the need for inner alignment with dharma.
Despite Sumantra’s attempts to persuade and shame her, Kaikeyi shows no visible remorse or emotional change.
By contrast (negatively), the verse underscores the absence of compassion and moral responsiveness in Kaikeyi at this moment.
Ask anything about this verse
Answers come straight from the texts, with the shlokas they draw on. Ask in your own words.
A free sign-in with Google or Apple keeps your chat saved across web and the app.
Read Valmiki Ramayana in the Vedapath app
Scan the QR code to open this directly in the app, with word-by-word meanings, Sanskrit recitation where available, and more.
