ऋषय ऊचुः । माहिषेण स्वरूपेण किंजातः सूतनंदन । अथवा शापदोषेण सञ्जातः केनचिद्वद
ṛṣaya ūcuḥ | māhiṣeṇa svarūpeṇa kiṃjātaḥ sūtanaṃdana | athavā śāpadoṣeṇa sañjātaḥ kenacidvada
Les sages dirent : « Ô fils de Sūta, pourquoi est-il né avec la forme d’un buffle ? Ou bien est-il devenu ainsi par la faute d’une malédiction ? Dis-le-nous. »
Ṛṣis (the sages)
Listener: Sūta
Scene: Sages lean forward, one pointing as if distinguishing two causal paths—‘natural form’ vs ‘curse’; Sūta listens poised to answer; behind them a symbolic split-panel: one side lineage-tree of asuras, other side a sage pronouncing a curse with a glowing word-stream.
Purāṇic storytelling links form and fate to causality—karma, śāpa, and moral history—inviting reflective inquiry rather than mere spectacle.
None directly; it is a narrative inquiry that precedes the Devī-māhātmya explanation.
None; it is a question about origin and causation.